Table 2.
Comparisons of Different Methods (unit: %). The highest DSC is in bold.
Method | DSC (mean ± SD) | Precision (mean ± SD) | Recall (mean ± SD) |
---|---|---|---|
Input 1 + 3D U-Net | 66.05±11.52 | 72.33±15.51 | 60.78±12.26 |
Input 2 + 3D U-Net | 67.86±9.42 | 74.11±13.57 | 62.58±10.01 |
Our input + 3D U-Net | 69.62±9.27 | 73.88±14.54 | 65.82±8.53 |
Input 1 + our network | 65.68 ±13.85 | 66.64±19.70 | 64.74±9.47 |
Input 2 + our network | 70.00±10.31 | 68.79±14.13 | 71.25±8.95 |
Proposed method | 70.73±10.19 | 72.68±14.51 | 68.89±10.00 |
Grow-cut-based method12 | 57.01 ±17.39 | 68.99±21.31 | 53.01±15.97 |
Component tree-based method13 | 69.20±10.26 | 70.29±15.21 | 66.43±12.05 |
GoogLeNet14 | 63.67±12.25 | 78.25±20.24 | 53.66 ±9.61 |
Input 1 + ResUNet15 | 63.93±13.86 | 66.24±18.30 | 61.78±11.47 |
Our input + ResUNet15 | 67.12±11.50 | 68.72±16.32 | 65.60±7.29 |
Input 1 + DUNet18 | 60.64±14.18 | 71.62±22.06 | 52.58±13.69 |
Our input + DUNet18 | 65.23±14.57 | 59.19±17.72 | 72.64±7.59 |
Input 1 + FCN19 | 64.47±14.31 | 63.87±19.72 | 65.08±8.51 |
Our input + FCN19 | 64.49±14.03 | 63.15±18.62 | 65.89±8.52 |
Input 1 + U-Net++20 | 66.29±12.42 | 76.53±18.39 | 58.47±10.90 |
Our input + U-Net++20 | 70.67±12.45 | 68.35±16.70 | 73.16 ±8.35 |