Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 13;9(2):21. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.2.21

Table 2.

Comparisons of Different Methods (unit: %). The highest DSC is in bold.

Method DSC (mean ± SD) Precision (mean ± SD) Recall (mean ± SD)
Input 1 + 3D U-Net 66.05±11.52 72.33±15.51 60.78±12.26
Input 2 + 3D U-Net 67.86±9.42 74.11±13.57 62.58±10.01
Our input + 3D U-Net 69.62±9.27 73.88±14.54 65.82±8.53
Input 1 + our network 65.68 ±13.85 66.64±19.70 64.74±9.47
Input 2 + our network 70.00±10.31 68.79±14.13 71.25±8.95
Proposed method 70.73±10.19 72.68±14.51 68.89±10.00
Grow-cut-based method12 57.01 ±17.39 68.99±21.31 53.01±15.97
Component tree-based method13 69.20±10.26 70.29±15.21 66.43±12.05
GoogLeNet14 63.67±12.25 78.25±20.24 53.66 ±9.61
Input 1 + ResUNet15 63.93±13.86 66.24±18.30 61.78±11.47
Our input + ResUNet15 67.12±11.50 68.72±16.32 65.60±7.29
Input 1 + DUNet18 60.64±14.18 71.62±22.06 52.58±13.69
Our input + DUNet18 65.23±14.57 59.19±17.72 72.64±7.59
Input 1 + FCN19 64.47±14.31 63.87±19.72 65.08±8.51
Our input + FCN19 64.49±14.03 63.15±18.62 65.89±8.52
Input 1 + U-Net++20 66.29±12.42 76.53±18.39 58.47±10.90
Our input + U-Net++20 70.67±12.45 68.35±16.70 73.16 ±8.35