Table 4.

Binary logistic regression model of support for a campus tobacco-free policy in the opinion poll as a function of respondent demographics, tobacco use, secondhand exposure, and beliefs (N=2217)^*

Variable	Odds Ratio	95% Confidence Interval
Affiliation, referent: undergraduate	--
Graduate student	1.16	[0.82, 1.64]
Staff	2.04	[1.43, 2.91]
Postdoctoral scholars	1.55	[1.09, 2.21]
Faculty	2.22	[1.30, 3.78]
Female (referent: male / other)	1.16	[0.92, 1.45]
Race/ethnicity, referent: Caucasian/White	--
Asian	1.76	[1.35, 2.28]
Other race	1.13	[0.83, 1.54]
Smokes cigarettes (referent: does not smoke)	0.48	[0.26, 0.89]
Has been exposed to tobacco smoke on campus	1.39	[1.04, 1.84]
Has been exposed to vape smoke on campus	0.81	[0.62, 1.07]
Had an episode of asthma/asthma attack in the past 12 months	1.98	[1.18, 3.35]
Believes a tobacco-free campus…
supports the health of the community	2.85	[1.40, 5.78]
helps prevent the uptake of tobacco	2.44	[1.74, 3.41]
helps people quit using tobacco	1.84	[1.44, 2.35]
helps ensure tobacco-free air to breathe	1.57	[0.90, 2.74]
reduces fire danger	1.41	[1.02, 1.95]
reduces litter on campus grounds	1.44	[0.96, 2.16]
violates personal freedoms	0.21	[0.16, 0.27]
stigmatizes those who use tobacco	0.46	[0.36, 0.58]
is the start of a slippery slope	0.57	[0.42, 0.77]
raises enforcement challenges	0.95	[0.74, 1.23]
Believes cigarette litter is a problem on campus	1.77	[1.39, 2.25]

^*Note: One participant missing data on both past year episode of asthma and current smoking status was excluded from the analysis.