Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 17;84(5):2592–2605. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28280

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(Top) PDFF (with magnification) and (bottom) R2 maps for (A) the breath‐held Cartesian reference technique, (B) the motion‐averaged reconstruction, (C) motion‐gating followed by conventional NUFFT and image‐based water‐fat separation, and (D) motion‐resolved XD reconstruction. The motion‐corrected parameter maps depict frame 2 (end‐expiration is frame 1). Visible streaking artifacts were observed in the PDFF maps from “Motion‐gated NUFFT (25% accept.)" (see arrow). Values in R2 maps from “Motion‐averaged" were elevated compared to R2 map values from “BH Cartesian," especially in the posterior segments. Opposed to that, R2 map values of “Motion‐resolved XD" were visually more consistent with respect to the Cartesian reference (see filled arrow heads)