Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 16;47(10):2328–2338. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04760-8

Table 3.

Univariate Cox regression of prognostic factors for biochemical relapse

Factors Univariate Cox regression
HR 95% CI p
Initial tumor stage (T2c ≤ vs. ≥ T3a) 0.67 0.43–1.05 0.08
Initial nodal status (N0 vs. N1) 0.67 0.43–1.05 0.08
Initial Gleason score (7a ≤ vs. ≥ 7b) 0.66 0.39–1.08 0.10
Initial resection status (R0 vs. R1) 1.02 0.67–1.58 0.91
PSA persistence > 0.1 ng/mL after RP (yes vs. no) 1.59 1.04–2.43 0.03*
PSA level at PMSA-PET imaging (> 0.8 ng/mL vs. ≤ 0.8 ng/mL) 0.51 0.32–0.79 0.003*
Age at relapse (continuous) 1.00 0.98–1.03 0.90
Local recurrence at PSMA-PET imaging (no vs. yes) 1.46 0.95–2.26 0.09
Pelvic lymph node lesions at PSMA-PET imaging (no vs. yes) 1.05 0.69–1.60 0.82
Distant metastases at PSMA-PET imaging
  Lymph nodes (no vs. yes) 0.80 0.40–1.60 0.53
  Bone (no vs. yes) 0.38 0.24–0.62 0.0001*
  Visceral (no vs. yes) 0.19 0.05–0.78 0.02*
Total number of lesions (1 versus > 1) 0.96 0.58–1.59 0.87
Use of additive ADT 2.56 1.51–4.36 0.0005*

PSA, prostate-specific antigen; RP, radical prostatectomy; PSMA-PET, prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography; ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval

*Significant result