Table 1.
Relative likelihood of the different models.
| Model | Max(log10(Lhoodi)a | AICib | Δib | Model normalizedrelative likelihood (wi)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | −766,690,638.2 | 353,302,140.1 | 4,348,409.527 | ~0 |
| Model 2 | −767,779,149.8 | 356,589,753.3 | 3,698,253.525 | ~0 |
| Model 3 | −769,356,470.5 | 354,589,522.2 | 2,635,452.236 | ~0 |
| Model 4 | −703,841,628.9 | 354,965,820.5 | 0 | ~1 |
| Model 5 | −739,200,638.81 | 355,289,547.6 | 2,015,896.025 | ~0 |
| Model 6 | −742,253,555.2 | 356,985,172.1 | 215,486.026 | ~0 |
| Model 7 | −742,377,897.5 | 359,863,214.1 | 1,548,753.025 | ~0 |
| Model 8 | −741,802,181.6 | 354,879,632.3 | 698,541.024 | ~0 |
| Model 9 | −720,729,162.1 | 352,308,124.1 | 1,523,698.014 | ~0 |
| Model 10 | −737,524,429.4 | 353,021,548.3 | 1,478,523.021 | ~0 |
| Model 11 | −737,955,129.6 | 358,796,852.5 | 4,589,632.027 | ~0 |
| Model 12 | −740,117,914.8 | 353,258,963.5 | 2,587,456.014 | ~0 |
| Model 13 | −743,951,293.5 | 353,336,542.2 | 5,214,852.061 | ~0 |
| Model 14 | −743,705,455.6 | 357,823,698.1 | 125,487.098 | ~0 |
| Model 15 | −741,996,174.1 | 353,358,963.1 | 1,253,698.017 | ~0 |
| Model 16 | −740,495,214.930 | 356,854,712.2 | 2,548,756.369 | ~0 |
| Model 17 | −745,012,396.560 | 359,586,325.2 | 2,548,741.258 | ~0 |
| Model 18 | −739,818,631.185 | 356,854,120.5 | 369,852.369 | ~0 |
a
Based on the best likelihood among the 50 independent runs for each model.
b
The calculation of AICi, Δi and wi are according to the methods shown in Excoffier et al. (2013).