TABLE 5.
The acoustic attributes of typical expression of 5 basic emotions in human music that find no correspondences in animal communication (based on Tables 3, 4).
Acoustic domains | AEs of music | Range of an aspect | Happiness features | Sadness features | Anger (aggression) features | Fear (anxiety) features | Tenderness (love) features |
1. Frequency | 1. Melodic pitch (consecutive “linear”) | high/low relation of tones | prevalence of ascension in the overall diverse contours, leaps, zigzags, sharpened intonation, wide ambitus | smooth contours, mainly steps, wave-like shapes, flat and falling intonation, narrow ambitus | prevalence of ascending contour, with sharpened shape of melodic contours | little variation in contours, interruptions, use of angular shapes, wide ambitus | prevalence of descending contour, mostly steps with occasional leaps, rising intonation, wave-like shapes |
2. Harmonic pitch (concurrent “vertical”) | concordant/discordant combination of tones | major, diatonic, prevalence of perfect 4th and 5th | minor, chromatic, dissonance, mostly small intervals | minor, chromatic, strong dissonance, wider intervals (major 7th, aug. 4th) | minor, strong dissonance | major, diatonic, general consonance | |
3. Form (complexity) | sameness (simplicity)/diversity (complexity) | relative simplicity | high complexity | n/a | n/a | low complexity | |
2. Time | 4. Tempo | fast/slow metric pulse | fast, with very restricted rubato | strong rubato and prevalence of ritenuto | minimal use of rubato | strong rubato and many tempo changes | slow and moderate, with moderate rubato |
5. Rhythm | short/long relation of tones | sharp contrasts of tones, yet smooth succession of groups | smoothened contrasts of tones due to frequent use of rubato | very sharp contrasts of tones, complex patterns with sudden changes | abrupt changes of tones and groups, general prevalence of diversity | smoothened contrasts of tones due to rubato use | |
6. Meter | periodicity of beat grouping | minimal deviations | n/a | tendency to syncopation | pronounced variability | moderate variability | |
7. Articulation | styles of attaching/detaching of successive tones | prevalence of staccato, great diversity of styles | prevalence of legato, with little diversity of styles | moderate diversity of articulation, occasional legato | stressed staccato (marcato), great stylistic diversity, many pauses | little diversity of styles | |
3. Amplitude | 8. Dynamics | loud/soft relation of tones | prevalence of loud and medium loud, with limited crescendo and diminuendo | prevalence of soft, with medium crescendo and diminuendo | mostly loud, with very little dynamic changes, accents tend to fall on unstable tones | prevalence of soft and medium soft, yet with diverse dynamic changes, mostly abrupt | few dynamic changes, accents tend to fall on stable tones |
4. Timbre | 9. Register | bright/dark relation of homogenous groups of tones | prevalence of bright register, raised singing formant, brightness | prevalence of bright register, lowered singing formant, dullness | prevalence of bright register, with little change, raised singing formant, harshness | prevalence of bright register with abrupt registral changes, mellowness | prevalence of dark register, lowered singing formant, mellowness |
10. Harmonicity, attack and vibrato | periodic/non-periodic spectral content of tones | harmonic richness, fast attack, medium vibrato with mid-fast rate | slow attack, little vibrato with a slow rate | harmonic richness, fast attack and decay, large vibrato with a mid-fast rate | gentle attacks; little and irregular vibrato with a fast rate | slow attacks, little vibrato with a mid-fast rate |
These attributes constitute a stock of TO features developed in the process of evolution of human music from hominin musilanguage. This includes changes in vertical harmony, in metric pulse, and in complexity of musical form; contrasts in melodic contour, in directionality of melodic intervals (sharpening for ascending, flattening for descending dyads), and in thematic material; diversity of rhythm, articulation and tempo; and ambitus size. Animal vocalizations do not seem to engage these categories in meaningful differentiation of calls.