Table 2.

Correlations (rho and p-values) between temporal information processing (TIP) and brain activity in regions of interest (ROIs) reflecting working memory (WM) manipulation (2- vs. 1-back) and maintenance (1- vs. 0-back).

Cluster peak, hemisphere	Brodmann area (BA)	No. of voxels	MNI coordinates			Rho	p
			x	y	z
2- vs. 1-back (manipulation)
Middle frontal gyrus, L	6	451	−26	2	54	−0.616	<0.0005
Middle frontal gyrus, L	46	207	−42	46	10	−0.583	<0.0005
Medial frontal gyrus, L	8	535	−2	24	48	−0.579	<0.0005
Middle frontal gyrus, R	6	668	26	6	52	−0.561	<0.0005
Middle frontal gyrus, R	9	754	38	40	32	−0.550	<0.0005
Insula, L	13	282	−30	24	2	−0.529	<0.0005
Superior frontal gyrus, L	6	42	−8	12	56	−0.520	0.001
Middle frontal gyrus, L	9	284	−40	30	30	−0.457	0.003
Inferior frontal gyrus, R	13	308	32	28	2	−0.450	0.004
Superior frontal gyrus, L	10	10	−24	48	0	−0.441	0.004
Inferior parietal lobule, L	40	1,083	−38	−44	40	−0.426	0.006
Inferior parietal lobule, R	40	984	48	−48	46	−0.372	0.018
Precuneus, R	7	255	10	−70	52	−0.359	0.023
Cerebellum, R	–	49	10	−74	−28	−0.303	0.057
Cerebellum, R	–	65	28	−64	−30	−0.279	0.081
Inferior frontal gyrus, L	6	69	−38	2	36	−0.261	0.103
Cerebellum, L	–	48	−12	−78	−26	−0.256	0.111
Cerebellum, L	–	251	−28	−66	−28	−0.245	0.127
Control ROI	18	4,120	10	−80	20	−0.141	0.386
1- vs. 0-back (maintenance)
Middle frontal gyrus, L	6	74	−26	0	56	−0.203	0.209
Inferior parietal lobule, R	7	75	40	−40	40	0.027	0.868
Superior parietal lobule, L	7	19	−12	−70	54	−0.047	0.772
Middle frontal gyrus, R	6	18	44	4	56	−0.167	0.302
Superior frontal gyrus, R	6	43	26	4	54	0.027	0.871
Inferior frontal gyrus, L	13	13	−30	22	8	−0.281	0.079
Medial frontal gyrus, L	8	14	−4	16	50	−0.131	0.421
Inferior frontal gyrus, L	44	10	−44	6	22	0.156	0.335
Control ROI	18	4,120	10	−80	20	−0.277	0.084

The p-value cutoff with Bonferroni correction for 2- vs. 1-back was 0.003, and for 1- vs. 0-back, it was 0.006 (for further explanation, see “Materials andMethods” section). Significant correlations are in bold.