Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul;8(14):850. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1023

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Scatter plots indicating the correlation of ocular and lenticular factors with IHOAs. Note: using data from right eyes. (A) Logarithmic internal higher order aberration (IHOA) RMS vs. axial length (P=0.092). (B) Logarithmic IHOA RMS vs. anterior chamber depth (ACD) (P=0.288). (C) Logarithmic IHOA RMS vs. spherical equivalent (SE) (P=0.019). (D) Logarithmic IHOA RMS vs. radius of anterior lens surface curvature (RAL) (P=0.479). (E) Logarithmic IHOA RMS vs. lens diameter (P=0.139). (F) Logarithmic IHOA RMS vs. lens tilt (P=0.130). (G) Logarithmic internal coma RMS vs. axial length (P=0.238). (H) Logarithmic internal coma RMS vs. ACD (P=0.194). (I) Logarithmic internal coma RMS vs. SE (P=0.040). (J) Logarithmic internal coma RMS vs. lens tilt (P=0.620). (K) Logarithmic internal coma RMS vs. lens diameter (P=0.058). (L) Logarithmic internal trefoil RMS vs. AL (P=0.085). (M) Logarithmic internal trefoil RMS vs. SE (P=0.009). (N) Logarithmic internal trefoil RMS vs. RAL (P=0.842). (O) Logarithmic internal trefoil RMS vs. lens tilt (P=0.020). (P) Logarithmic internal trefoil RMS vs. lens decentration (P=0.187). (Q) Logarithmic internal spherical RMS vs. lens tilt (P=0.002). (R) Logarithmic internal spherical RMS vs. lens decentration (P=0.435). (S) Logarithmic internal secondary astigmatism (SA) RMS vs. AL (P=0.250). (T) Logarithmic internal SA RMS vs. ACD (P=0.305). (U) Logarithmic internal SA RMS vs. RAL (P=0.471). (V) Logarithmic internal SA RMS vs. RPL (P=0.949). (W) Logarithmic internal SA RMS vs. lens thickness (P=0.972). (X) Logarithmic internal SA RMS vs. lens tilt (P=0.114). Ln: logarithmic, the natural logarithmic transformation (base e) was used in linear regression analyses to approximate HOA data to a normal distribution. RMS, root mean square; RAL, radius of anterior lens surface curvature; D, Diopter.