Table 3.

Bivariate associations between categorical and continuous predictors and discussing genetic

CATEGORICAL PREDICTRS	Discussed N (%)	Did Not Discuss N (%)	X2	P
Randomization Group
RGC	154 (72.0%)	60 (28.0%)	2.04	.154
UC	68 (64.15%)	38 (35.85%)
Made Treatment Decision
Yes	121 (62.7%)	72 (37.3%)	10.22	.001
No	101 (79.5%)	26 (20.5%)
Marital Status
Married	152 (72.7%)	57 (27.3%)	3.19	.074
Not Married	70 (63.1%)	41 (36.9%)
Employment
Full-Time	160 (69.9%)	69 (30.1%)	.09	.761
< Full-Time	62 (68.1%)	29 (31.9%)
Race/Ethnicity
Non- Hispanic White	160 (73.1%)	59 (26.9%)	4.43	.035
Racial/Ethnic Minority	62 (61.4%)	39 (38.6%)
Study Site
Washington, DC	198 (72.0%)	77 (28.0%)	6.34	.012
New York	24 (53.3%)	21 (46.7%)
BCS Candidate
Yes	140 (63.9%)	79 (36.1%)	11.25	.001
No	81 (82.65%)	17 (17.35%)
ER/PR Status*
Positive	147 (73.5%)	53 (26.5%)	.61	.437
Negative	34 (68.0%)	16 (32.0%)
Cancer Stage+
Stage 0/1	107 (72.8%)	40 (27.2%)	.00	.995
Stage 2/3	67 (72.8%)	25 (27.2%)
Breast Cancer Detected
Routine Mammogram	102 (67.6%)	49 (32.5%)	.45	.503
Other	120 (71.0%)	49 (29.0%)
CONTINUOUS PREDICTORS	Discussed M (SD)	Did not Discuss M (SD)	t	P
Objective Risk (BRCAPRO Probability %)	16.33 (24.16)	7.41 (11.65)	12.11	.001
Knowledge	56.68 (19.31)	44.43 (25.14)	20.58	<.0001
IES - Avoidance Total	14.57 (9.09)	15.57 (10.60)	.86	.391
IES - Intrusion Total	19.62 (9.84)	16.50 (10.41)	2.58	.010
Psychological Distress (BSI- Total)	40.77 (13.56)	35.51 (13.88)	10.02	.002
Decision Conflict	18.68 (23.89)	15.46 (21.10)	1.30	.254
Perceived Breast Cancer Risk	42.99 (27.33)	23.81 (23.24)	32.22	<.0001
FACT-G Total	90.30 (9.93)	89.64 (12.08)	.52	.607
Age	45.18 (8.85)	48.11 (6.87)	8.49	.004

RGC: rapid genetic counseling; UC: usual care; BCS: Breast conservation surgery;