Table 2.

Challenges and solutions identified during phase 2.

Challenge	Solution
Pilot sparked interested from additional hospital and university educators	(1) Invited speech therapy, exercise science, occupational therapy, nutrition, chaplaincy, and social work students and instructors
Additional schools, larger numbers of students	(1) Educational sessions held at 3 different universities
	(2) Some sessions held in evening or on weekend
Students at variety of educational levels	(1) All students viewed presession didactics on TeamSTEPPS® and geriatric fall prevention
	(2) Medical, pharmacy, and advanced practice students viewed additional didactic on evaluation and treatment
Students did not like poster session open flow	(1) Facilitators assigned to poster/skill session
	(2) Students rotated by profession, so instruction matched learner needs
Too many students to participate in FRRC∗	(1) Some pharmacy, medical, and nurse practitioner students participated with clinic preceptors
	(2) SP† added to educational session
	(3) Students ran IP‡ session after SP evaluation
Students required feedback on SP	(1) Students presented SP IP results to expert panel
	(2) Panel consisted of FRRC clinical and university educators

^∗Fall Risk Reduction Clinic. ^†Standardized patient. ^‡Interprofessional.