Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 3;13:134. doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-01774-0

Table 3.

Phenotypic variation of five growth period traits for the two parents and derived RIL populations in two environments

Environment Trait Parents RIL population
GH06 P174 Range (days) Mean (days) SD Median Variance CV(%) Kurtosis Skewness
17CQ DIF 147 135 131–161 143.72 6.33 144 40.12 4.41 0.08 − 0.71
DFF 171 171 157–186 173.85 5.04 174 25.44 2.90 − 0.60 0.45
FP 24 36 21–39 30.40 3.82 30 14.61 12.57 0.16 − 0.52
MT 43 41 30–54 40.41 4.10 40 16.78 10.14 0.52 0.73
GP 214 212 205–220 214.24 3.03 214 9.21 1.42 − 0.36 0.00
18CQ DIF 155 149 148–160 152.90 2.59 153 6.70 1.69 0.28 0.02
DFF 170 168 165–179 170.84 2.94 171 8.63 1.72 0.25 − 0.42
FP 15 19 13–23 18.19 2.18 18 4.76 11.99 0.11 − 0.23
MT 39 35 25–43 34.27 3.26 34 10.61 9.51 0.04 − 0.07
GP 209 203 201–212 205.14 3.07 204 9.44 1.50 0.63 − 0.72

17CQ, 17 Chongqing; 18CQ, 18 Chongqing; SD, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation; DIF, days to initial flowering; DFF, days to final flowering; FP, flowering period; MT, maturity time; GP, growth period