Table 4.
Groups | Lumbar (n = 81) |
Hip (n = 106) |
Knee (n = 43) |
Foot & Ankle (n = 27) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Score of the two-step test | ||||
Before surgery, mean (SD) | 1.09 (0.26) #,§ | 0.97 (0.23) *,¶ | 0.85 (0.28) *,¶ | 1.19 (0.19) #,§ |
6 months after surgery, mean (SD) | 1.16 (0.24)§ | 1.15 (0.20)§ | 1.04 (0.24) *, #,¶ | 1.17 (0.18)§ |
12 months after surgery, mean (SD) | 1.20 (0.24)§ | 1.18 (0.20)§ | 1.06 (0.23) *, #,¶ | 1.25 (0.15)§ |
Prevalence of patients with LS improvement based on two-step test | ||||
6 months after surgery, % | 38.3% | 48.1% | 27.9% | 18.5% |
12 months after surgery, % | 46.9% | 59.4% | 34.9% | 44.4% |
*P < 0.05 versus Lumbar group, #P < 0.05 versus Hip group, §P < 0.05 versus Knee group, ¶P < 0.05 versus Foot & Ankle group,
LS locomotive syndrome; SD standard deviation
The scores of < 1.1 and < 1.3 were classified as LS stages 2 and 1, respectively
LS improvement was defined as the postoperative downgrade of LS grade in each of the tests
When the preoperative LS grade was zero in the rare cases, the improvement was defined as the postoperative improved measurements of the tests