Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 3;18:264. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01510-0

Table 3.

Quality assessment of included studies

Study Total score Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6 Item 7 Item 8 Item 9 Item 10
Gorin-Lazard, A. et al. [44] 7 Y Y Y Y Y Y NA Y NA NA
Vasegh Rahimparvar, F. et al. [17] 6 Y N Y Y Y UC UC Y Y NA
Newfield, E. et al. [16] 7 NA Y Y Y Y Y Y NA Y N
Motmans, J. et al. [15] 6 NA UC Y Y Y Y UC Y Y NA
Wierckx, K. et al. [24] 6 Y UC Y Y Y N N Y Y N
Thompson, HM. et al. [45] 7 Y N Y Y Y NA Y Y Y NA
George, A. et al. [43] 6 Y Y Y Y Y N N Y NA UC
Başar, K. et al. [42] 6 Y Y Y Y Y NA UC Y N UC

Item 1: Was the sample representative of the target population?

Item 2: Were study participants recruited an appropriate way?

Item 3: Was the sample size adequate?

Item 4: Where the study subjects and setting described in detail?

Item 5: Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample?

Item 6: Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?

Item 7: Was the condition measured reliably?

Item 8: Was there appropriate statistical analysis?

Item 9: Are all important confounding factors/subgroups/different identified and accounted for?

Item 10: Were subpopulations identified using objective criteria?

Y Yes, N No, UC Unclear, NA Not applicable