Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 Jun 5;59(32):13484–13489. doi: 10.1002/anie.202002271

Table 1.

Optimal conditions for primary pyridinium salts.

graphic file with name nihms-1607908-t0004.jpg
Entry[a] Change in condition from scheme G 1 (%)[b]
1 None F 82 (79)
2[c] In situ formation of acyl fluoride F 75
3 L1 instead of L5 F 62
4 L2 instead of L5 F 65
5 L3 instead of L5 F 53
6 L4 instead of L5 F 41
7 Different G SPy 4
8 Different G OPy 11
9[e] Zn instead of Mn F 5
10[d] No nickel F 0
11[d] No ligand F 0
12[e] No Mn reductant F 0
[a]

Pyridinium salt (0.125 mmol, 1 equiv), acyl fluoride (0.125 mmol, 1 equiv), NiCl2(dme) (0.0125 mmol, 10 mol %), ligand (0.0125 mmol, 10 mol %), Mn (0.1875 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was stirred in NMP (0.8 mL) at 60 °C for 24 h.

[b]

GC yield vs 1,3.5-trimethoxybenzene standard. Isolated yield in parentheses.

[c]

Carboxylic acid (0.125 mmol, 1 equiv), TFFH (0.125 mmol, 1 equiv), 1,8-bis(dimethylamino)naphthylene (0.125 mmol, 1 equiv), NMP (0.8 mL).

[d]

Significant amount of acyl fluoride recovered.

[e]

Both starting materials recovered.

G = Activating Group.