. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 3.

Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2011 Jan 7;406(4):620–630. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.12.044

Table 2.

Indication of E2^Ubc9’s important atomic positional fluctuation values (in angstrom)^a

	Isolated E2^Ubc9	E2^Ubc9–E3^RanBP2–SUMO–Target^RanGAP1	E2^Ubc9–SUMO–Target^RanGAP1
For the whole simulation time
E2^Ubc9’s loop 2	3.7±1.9	19.9±13.6	8.6±4.9
The whole protein except loop 2	0.7±0.7	0.6±0.6	0.6±0.6
E2^Ubc9’s catalytic Cys	1.8	0.3	0.2
E2^Ubc9’s built-in E3	1.1±0.2	0.8±0.3	0.6±0.3
For specific time periods of E2^Ubc9–E3^RanBP2–SUMO–Target^RanGAP1
	2–15 ns	19–24 ns	25–30 ns^b

E2^Ubc9’s loop 2	4.5±2.8	4.5±2.8	4.1±2.3
E3^RanBP2’s flexible linker (Asp2665–Asp2673)	6.3±4.1	5.0±4.2	3.1±1.5
For specific time periods of E2^Ubc9–SUMO–Target^RanGAP1
	5.5–7.5 ns^b	17–25 ns

E2^Ubc9’s loop 2	1.6±0.4	3.0±2.2

Each entry corresponds to mean±SD of the atomic positional fluctuation values. The maximum and minimum values of the data set are indicated in parentheses.

The time intervals are selected from the time windows where no strong correlation is observed at the E2^Ubc9–Target^RanGAP1 interface.