Skip to main content
. 2020 May 22;152(8):e201912525. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201912525

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

EP1, EP2, and EP3 receptors are not involved in mediating the stimulatory effect of PGE2 on ENaC. In the left and middle panels, representative ISC recordings are shown. At the time point indicated by an arrow, cells were exposed to 10 µM AH6809 (EP2 receptor antagonist; left panel, solid line), 100 nM sulprostone (EP1/EP3 receptor agonist; middle panel, solid line), or vehicle in matched control recordings (control, dashed line). Approximately 30 min later, all cells were exposed to 100 nM basolateral PGE2 and subsequently to apical amiloride (Ami; 10 µM) as indicated. Summary data (right panel) are presented as ΔISC values, which were determined by subtracting the corresponding baseline ISC from the ISC reached in the presence (+) or absence (−) of PGE2, AH6809, and sulprostone as indicated. Data are presented as individual values and their mean ± SEM; paired data are connected by dashed lines. Numbers of experiments are given in parenthesis. ns, P > 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test.