Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 11;217(8):e20192291. doi: 10.1084/jem.20192291

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Lung TRM cells are reactivated more rapidly but less efficiently than TLN cells in medLNs. (A) P14/OT-I Nur77-GFP immune chimeras were generated by cotransferring naive P14+ (Thy1.1+) and OT-I+ (Ly5.1+) Nur77-GFP CD8+ T cells (5 × 104 cells each) into C57BL/6 (Th1.2+/Ly5.2+) mice 1 d before i.n. coinfection with recombinant influenza X31-gp33 and X31-ova. 30 d later, the P14/OT-I Nur77-GFP immune chimeras were reinfected with PR8-gp33 i.n., and reactivation of P14+ lung TRM and medLN TLN cells was assessed at 0, 12, 24, 48, and 120 h.p.i. (B) Representative flow plots of Nur77-GFP expression in P14+ lung TRM cells and medLN TLN cells. In vivo labeling with αCD8β antibody was used to distinguish CD8+ TRM cells in the lung parenchyma from CD8+ T cells in the vasculature. (C and D) Frequency of Nur77-GFP+ CD8β P14+ cells (i.e., top left quadrant of flow plots) in B was quantified. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. (E and F) As negative controls, Nur77-GFP expression in OT-I+ and P14+ cells was examined after PR8-gp33 and PR8 2° infection, respectively. (G) To limit the contribution of TCIRC cells, a low dose of αThy1.1 (clone 19E12)–depleting antibody was administered i.p., and the frequency of Nur77-GFP+ P14+ TRM cell reactivation was examined. N.D., not detected. Antigen-activated P14+ lung TRM (blue) and medLN TLN (red) cells are distinguished from the bystander-activated OT-I+ lung TRM (green) and medLN TLN (gold) cell samples by color. Data shown are representative of two independent experiments (n = 3–5 mice/group).