Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2019 Sep 19;125(10):e75–e92. doi: 10.1161/RES.0000000000000291
Reviewer Employment Research Grant Other Research Support Speakers’ Bureau/Honoraria Expert Witness Ownership Interest Consultant/Advisory Board Other
Chris Denning University of Nottingham (United Kingdom) None None None None None None None
Mitchell S. Elkind Columbia University NINDS (NOMAS grant on stroke incidence and risk factors); Biogen (PI of clinical trial)* BMS-Pfizer Alliance for Eliquis (support in kind for stroke trial); Roche (support in kind for a trial of stroke) None Merck/Organon; Auxilium; LivaNova (Sorin) None Abbott*;
Vascular
Dynamics*; Medtronic*
Raj Kishore Temple University None None None None None None None
Martin Traebert Preclinical Safety (Switzerland) None None None None None None None
This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be “significant” if (a) the person receives $10 000 or more during any 12-month period, or 5% or more of the person’s gross income; or (b) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns $10 000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be “modest” if it is less than “significant” under the preceding definition.
*
Modest
Significant.