Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 3;5:30. doi: 10.1038/s41525-020-0135-2

Table 2.

Concordance of Astrolabe, Aldy, and Stargazer on test cases (N = 154) homozygous for SNV-defined star alleles at 30×.

Astrolabe Aldy Stargazer
Run 1 Run 2 Run 1 Run 2
Match 142 (92%) 152 (99%) 148 (96%) 149 (97%) 135 (88%)
Mismatch 9 (6%) 1 (1%) 4 (3%) 3 (2%) 19 (12%)
Ungenotyped 3 (2%) 1 (1%) 2 (1%) 1 (1%) 0
Inconsistencies
Algorithm Challenges Discordant cases Notes
Astrolabe Undefined suballeles *2.014, *4.002, *4.003, *4.007, *4.009, *52.002, *56.003 Ambiguous calls or miscalls
Indel-defined alleles *18.001 Position discordance with database
Aldy Undefined suballeles *12.002, *71.003 Ambiguous calls or miscalls
Indel-defined alleles *18.001, *20.001, *38.001 Position discordance with database
Stargazer Indel-defined alleles *20.001 Position discordance with database
Alleles with unknown or uncertain function and/or rare alleles 18 alleles including *30.001, *37.001, *58.001, *52.001, *64.001, *65.001, and *73.001 (Supplementary Data Set 2) Stargazer reports background alleles as the main haplotypes in these cases. Exact haplotypes (matching truthset) in the sample(s) are reported among other candidate haplotypes. (See discussion for details)

The complete list of genotypes called per sample is provided in Supplementary Data Set 2.

Run 1 and Run 2 indicate results before and after defining missing suballeles in the allele tables, respectively. There was only one run for Stargazer as it does not typically call suballeles.