Skip to main content
. 2020 May 22;5(2):73–80. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.98698

TABLE 3.

Questions with statistical significance (P<0.05)

S. No Question P value
Knowledge Based Questions
1 Position of insert for all the irrigant agitation methods except negative pressure technique? 0.007
2 Position of insert for negative pressure technique? 0.001
3 How many cycles of ultrasonic assisted irrigation are required for each canal? <0.001
4 Duration of micro irrigation(one cycle) for negative pressure technique? 0.008
5 According to you which is the main reason for using irrigant activation techniques? <0.001
Attitude Based Questions
1 Sodium hypochlorite irrigant alone will be sufficient for all clinical situations in root canal treatment <0.001
2 Irrigant penetration into the lateral canal, isthmus and accessory canal is necessary for better treatment outcome 0.008
3 Do you feel irrigant activation is necessary for root canal disinfection? <0.001
4 Will irrigant activation help in vapor lock disruption? 0.003
5 Manual dynamic activation procedure can disrupt vapor lock 0.005
6 Do you feel ultrasonic assisted irrigation (PUI) is the most effective method for isthmus disinfection? 0.007
7 Do you feel larger apical diameter is necessary for using apical negative pressure technique? 0.005
8 Do you feel complete disinfection of Isthmus is possible with any of these methods? <0.001
9 Is Apical extrusion common with irrigant agitation methods? 0.001
Practice Based Questions
1 Do you use irrigant activation techniques routinely? <0.001
2 Which of the following adjuncts to irrigation do you utilize? <0.001
3 Do you differ on choice of irrigant(s) based on the periapical diagnosis? <0.001
4 Do you routinely aim to remove the smear layer? 0.005
5 What is your primary irrigant of choice? <0.001
6 Needle gauge? 0.002
7 Type of irrigating needle used? <0.001
8 Which of the following irrigants you prefer for activation? 0.009
9 Choice of irrigants for periapical infections? <0.001