Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;11:1505. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01505

Table 3.

Comparison of autoantibodies among patients with different cGVHD grade.

Chronic GVHD grade
No
(n = 42)
Mild
(n = 11)
Moderate/Severe
(n = 31)
P
Autoantibodies Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive
Anti-Ro52 41 (97.6) 1 (2.4) 9 (81.8) 2 (18.2) 21 (67.7) 10 (32.3) <0.01
ANA 35 (83.3) 7 (16.7) 9 (81.8) 2 (18.2) 12 (38.7) 19 (61.3) <0.001
Anti-Rib-P 42 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 11 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 30 (96.8) 1 (3.2) 0.42
AHA 42 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 10 (90.9) 1 (9.1) 31 (100.0) 0 (0.0) <0.05
Anti-PM/Scl 42 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 11 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 30 (96.8) 1 (3.2) 0.42
Anti-Jo-1 42 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 11 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 30 (96.8) 1 (3.2) 0.42
AMA-M2 42 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 11 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 29 (93.5) 2 (6.5) 0.17
Anti-CENP-B 42 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 11 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 30 (96.8) 1 (3.2) 0.42

GVHD, graft-vs.-host disease; anti-Ro52, anti-Ro52 autoantibodies; ANA, anti-nuclear autoantibodies; anti-Rib-P, anti-ribosomal P protein autoantibodies; AHA, anti-histone autoantibodies; anti-PM/Scl, anti-polymyositis/scleroderma autoantibodies; anti-Jo-1, anti-histidyl tRNA synthetase autoantibodies; AMA-M2, anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies type 2; anti-CENP-B, anti-centromere-B autoantibodies.