Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;11:1505. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01505

Table 4.

Comparison of clinical characteristics between patients who developed autoantibodies and patients who did not develop autoantibodies.

Autoantibodies
Characteristics Negative
(n = 48)
Positive
(n = 36)
P
Age, median (range), y 30 (16–61) 29 (17–51) 1.00
Gender, no (%) 0.82
    Male 32 (66.7) 25 (69.4)
    Female 16 (33.3) 11 (30.6)
Primary disease, no (%)a 0.67
    ALL 20 (41.7) 18 (50.0)
    AML 26 (54.1) 16 (44.4)
    Others 2 (4.2) 2 (5.6)
Conditioning regimen, no (%)b 1.00
    Myeloablative 38 (79.2) 29 (80.6)
    Intensified 10 (20.8) 7 (19.4)
HLA typing, no (%) <0.05
    Matched 25 (52.1) 28 (77.8)
    Mismatched 23 (47.9) 8 (22.2)
Source of graft, no (%) <0.01
    BM + PBSC 27 (56.2) 9 (25.0)
    PBSC 21 (43.8) 27 (75.0)
GVHD prophylaxis, no (%)c <0.01
    ATG based 30 (62.5) 10 (27.8)
    Non-ATG based 18 (37.5) 26 (72.2)
Acute GVHD grade, no (%) 0.46
    0-I 37 (77.1) 25 (69.4)
    II-IV 11 (22.9) 11 (30.6)
Chronic GVHD grade, no (%) <0.001
    No 34 (70.8) 8 (22.2)
    Mild 7 (14.6) 4 (11.1)
    Moderate/Severe 7 (14.6) 24 (66.7)

ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; BM, bone marrow; PBSC, peripheral blood stem cell; GVHD, graft-vs.-host disease; ATG, antithymocyte globulin.

a

The other category included aplastic anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and lymphoma.

b

Myeloablative conditioning regimens include TBI (total body irradiation) + Cy (cyclophosphamide), Bu (busulfan)+ Cy, and Bu + Flu (fludarabine). Intensified conditioning regimens include TBI + Cy + etoposide, and Flu + cytarabine + TBI + Cy.

c

Non-ATG based GVHD prophylaxis include cyclosporine A (CsA), methotrexate (MTX), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). ATG based GVHD prophylaxis include CsA + MTX + MMF + ATG.