TABLE 4.
Caregiver implementation fidelity and child engagement.
Task | Caregiver implementation fidelity (%) |
Child engagement (%) |
|||||
Ideal | Sufficient | Poor | Other | M (SD) | Minimum | Maximum | |
Attention: video | 50 | 37.5 | 12.5 | 0 | 91 (13) | 57 | 100 |
Developmental play | 89.6 | 8.3 | 2.1 | 0 | 94 (8) | 76 | 100 |
*Name call | 93.8 | 6.2 | 0 | 0 | 87 (19) | 32 | 100 |
Negative affect | 87.5 | 12.5 | 0 | 0 | 78 (33) | 14 | 100 |
Positive affect | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84 (29) | 0 | 100 |
Attention: toy | 93.8 | 6.2 | 0 | 0 | 88 (17) | 50 | 100 |
Parent–child interaction | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 91 (12) | 57 | 100 |
*Discrete ASD presses | 79.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 88 (23) | 10 | 100 |
Parent–child story time | 87.5 | 6.2 | 0 | 6.2 | 91 (14) | 50 | 100 |
Overall | 86.1 | 7.7 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 91 (9) | 72 | 99 |
*Additional play-based presses were piloted in a portion of participants, focused on constructs such as stereotyped behaviors, response to changes in facial affect, and social smiles. These presses are included in engagement data but excluded in fidelity data.