Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;27:102359. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102359

Table 1.

Summary of sample characteristics, methodology and main findings for studies of APOE.

Study N (E4 carriers; non-carriers) Age (SD) dMRI Method Field Strength (T) B value (s/mm2) Acquisition Voxel Size (mm) N Directions NEX Regions of Interest Results
Adluru et al, 2014 343 (123; 220) 61.03 (6.72) ROI 3 0, 1300 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 40 1 Fornix, splenium & genu of corpus callosum, cingulum, uncinate, superior longitudinal fasiculus. • Older (>65) carriers vs. non-carriers: ↑MD in SLF & cingulum bundle
Bagepally et al, 2012 32 (19; 13) 69.3 (5.7) TBSS 3 0, 1000 Not reported 32 1 Whole brain • AD carriers vs. AD non-carriers: ↓ FA in left medial temporal areas, parahippocampal cingulum, bilateral intracalcarine sulcus, precuneus, lingual area
• Healthy carriers vs. healthy non-carriers: ↓ FA bilateral medial temporal areas, scattered regions in frontal & parietal lobes & cerebellum
Bendlin et al, 2010 136 (56; 80) 69.2 (10.2) VBA 3 0 2 × 2 × 3 12 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: no significant differences
Brown et al, 2011 55 (25; 30) 62.3 (9.0) Structural connectivity 3 800 or 1000 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 30 1 Global & regional connectivity • Carriers vs. non-carriers: age-related loss of mean local interconnectivity, & regional local interconnectivity decreases in the precuneus, medial orbitofrontal cortex, & lateral parietal cortex.
Cai et al, 2017 309 (116; 193) 73.9 (4.6) VBA 3 Not reported 1.02 × 1.02 × 1.02 Not reported 1 Superior corona radiata, genu of corpus callosum • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↑ MD in superior corona radiata, genu of corpus callosum. No significant associations with FA or RD
Cavedo et al, 2017 74 (31; 43)
across 4 centres
68.9 (6.9) TBSS, VBA 1.5 or 3 0, 1000 or 0, 800 2 × 2 × 2
or 1 × 1 × 2.4
12, 15, 20 or 60 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ FA globally, and in genu, body & splenium of corpus callosum, internal capsule, external capsule, inferior fronto-occipital & inferior longitudinal fasciculi, cingulum (left & right). ↑ MD in right hemisphere, in genu of corpus callosum, right internal capsule, right corona radiate, right superior longitudinal fasiculus. ↑ RD globally, & bilaterally in genu & splenium of corpus callosum, internal capsule, inferior fronto-occipital & inferior longitudinal fasciculi, cingulum, external capsule
Chen et al, 2016 75 (35; 40) 65.8 (7.5) Structural connectivity 3 0, 1000 Not reported 30 3 Whole brain structural network • Carriers vs. controls: lower global efficiency, no significant differences in local efficiency. Decreased nodal efficiency in left anterior cingulate, left paracingulate gyrus, right dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus, left inferior occipital gyrus
• Case/control prediction: ROC AUC for global efficiency 0.74; decreasing region 0.81
Dell'Acqua et al, 2015 575 (119; 374) 14.4 (0.5)  TBSS 3 0, 1300 2.4 × 2.4 × 2.4 60 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: no significant differences
Dowell et al, 2013 41 (20; 21) 20.0 (2.0) TBSS 1.5 0, 1000 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 30 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. controls: ↑ RD in carriers, partidcularly in inferior longitudinal fasciculus. No significant differences in FA or MD.
Heise et al, 2010 71 (33; 38) Young cohort 28.6 (4.2);
Older cohort: 64.9 (7.2)
TBSS   1000 1.1 × 0.9 × 3   1 Whole brain • Young carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ FA in cingulum, corona radiata, corpus callosum, external capsule, internal capsule, superior longitudinal fasciculus
• Older carriers vs. non-carriers: ↑ MD in cingulum, corona radiata, corpus callosum, external capsule, internal capsule, superior longitudinal fasciculus
• All carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ FA in cingulum, corona radiata, corpus callosum, external capsule, internal capsule, superior longitudinal fasciculus
Honea et al, 2009 53 (14; 39) 73.4 (6.3) TBSS 3 0, 1000 1 × 1 × 1 12 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: no significant differences
Kljajevic et al, 2014 126 (63; 63)
across 5 centres
67.7 (5.9) VBA 1.5 + 3 0, 800 or 0, 1000 2 × 2 × 2,
2 × 2 × 2.5
or 2 × 2 × 3
6 or 20 1 Whole brain • Healthy carriers vs. healthy non-carriers: ↑ MD in left lentiform nucleus
• AD carriers & AD non-carriers: ↓ FA in middle frontal areas, insular white matter, superior temporal areas
Laukka et al, 2015 89 (23; 66) 81.4 (3.0) TBSS 1.5 600 1 × 1 × 1 6 1 Cingulate gyrus part of cingulum, parahippocampal cingulum, corticospinal tract, forceps major & minor, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, superior longitudinal fasciculus • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ FA in forceps major, ↑ MD in corticospinal tract
Lyall et al, 2014 645 (187; 423) 72.7 (0.7) ROI 1.5 0, 1000 1.8 × 1.8 × 1.8 64 1 Genu & splenium of corpus callosum, bilateral anterior thalamic radiations, ventral & rostral cingulum bundles, & arcuate, uncinate, & inferior longitudinal fasciculi. • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ FA in right ventral cingulum & left inferior longitudinal fasciculus
Ma et al, 2017 885 (145; 729) 65.3 (7.4) Structural connectivity 3 T 1000 Not reported 30 1 Whole brain structural network •Healthy carriers vs healthy non-carriers: ↑ clustering coefficient & local efficiency
• MCI carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ clustering coefficient & local efficiency
• All carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ nodal efficiency in: inferior frontal gyrus, orbital part; left superior frontal gyrus, orbital part; left middle occipital gyrus. ↑ nodal efficiency in: left cuneus; left inferior parietal but supramarginal and angular gyri
Newlander et al, 2014 14 (7; 7) 72.7 (6.1) VBA 1.5 0, 800 1 × 1 × 1 12 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ FA in genu of corpus callosum & brain stem
Nierenberg et al, 2005 29 (14; 15) 67.1 (6.5) ROI 1.5 0, 1000 Not reported 20 1 Parahippocampal cingulum • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ FA & ↑ RD in parahippocampal cingulum
Nyberg et al, 2014 273 (69; 204) 67.01 (8.0) TBSS, VBA 3 1000 0.98 × 0.98 × 2 32 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. controls: no significant difference for whole brain metrics or specific subregion metrics in TBSS. ↓ FA in five anterior and posterior midline regions on VBA
O'Dwyer et al, 2012 44 (22; 22) 26.7 (4.0) TBSS 3 1000 2 × 2 × 2 60 1 Whole brain • Carrier vs. non-carrier: no significant differences in diffusion indices
• Carrier/non-carrier prediction accuracy: sensitivity & specificity range 93–100% using a feature selection algorithm, support vector machines & FA data
Operto et al, 2018 532 (275; 257) 58.1 (7.5) TBSS 3 0, 1000 2 × 2 × 2 64 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↑ MD, RD & LD in corona radiata, superior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, corticospinal tract
Persson et al, 2006 60 (30; 30) 66.3 (7.7) ROI Not reported 1000 Not reported 6 1 Whole brain analysis; genu, splenium, body of corpus callosum • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ FA in occipito-frontal fasciculus, body of corpus callosum
Ryan et al, 2011 126 (36; 88) 69.2 (10.2) ROI 3 0, 1000 2.6 × 2.6 × 2.6 25 2 Frontal white matter, lateral parietal white matter, centrum semiovale, genu of the corpus callosum, splenium of the corpus callosum, temporal stem white matter. • Carriers vs. non-carriers: no significant difference in LD, ↓ FA in frontal white matter & splenium
Salminen et al, 2013 64 (23; 41) 61.75 (7.6) ROI 3 0, 996 2 × 2 × 2 31 1 Left uncinate fasciculus, right uncinate fasciculus, temporal lobe • Carriers vs. controls: ↓ fibre bundle length in left uncinate fasciculus
Slattery et al, 2017 37 (22; 15) 61.7 (5.0) TBSS, ROI 3 1000 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 64 1 Quadrants (anterior, posterior, left & right) • AD carriers vs. AD non-carriers: ↓ FA in splenium of corpus callosum & anterior corona radiata. ↑ RD in white-matter projections from frontal lobes. More widespread ↓ NDI in parieto-occipital white-matter projections. ↑ FISO in corpus callosum
• Healthy carriers vs. non-carriers: no significant differences
Smith et al, 2016 88 (34; 53) 74.1 (4.5) TBSS 3 0, 1000 1 × 1 × 1 25 2 Longitudinal fasciculus, sagittal stratum, uncinate fasciculus, cingulate gyrus, parahippocampal cingulumfornix, body, genum & splenium of corpus callosum, internal capsule, corona radiata • Carriers vs. non-carriers: no significant effects on FA, LD or MD. ↑ RD in right anterior internal capsule, bilateral posterior corona radiata, left superior corona radiata.
Wai et al, 2014 120 (22; 98) 68.9 (7.7) TBSS 3 1000 2 × 2 × 2 64 1 Whole brain • Amnestic MCI carriers vs. controls: ↓ FA & ↑ MD
Wang et al, 2015 241 (73; 126) 72.0 (9.0) TBSS 1.5 0, 600 1 × 1 × 1 6 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: no significant differences
Westlye et al, 2012 203 (60; 143) 47.6 (14.9) TBSS 1.5 1000 2 × 2 × 2 60 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: increased RD brainstem, basal temporal lobe, internal capsule, anterior parts of the corpus callosum, forceps minor,
superior longitudinal fasciculus, occipital & corticospinal pathways.
Zhang et al, 2015 75 (35; 40) 65.9 (7.5) TBSS, VBA 3 0, 1000 2 × 2 × 2 30 1 Genu, body, splenium of corpus callosum, anterior & posterior corona radiate, fornix, cerebral peduncles, parahippocampal cingulum • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ FA & ↑ MD in genu & body or corpus callosum, anterior & posterior corona radiate bilaterally with TBSS. ↓ FA in genu and body of corpus callosum & right fornix stria terminalis , ↑ MD in genu & splenium of corpus callosum, right cerebral penduncle & right parahippocampal cingulum with VBA

Please note that we report findings from the most rigorous analyses conducted by studies, including models controlling for multiple comparisons. When not otherwise reported, NEX was assumed to be 1. Acronyms: dMRI = diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; E4 = APOE Epsilon 4; TBSS = Tract-Based Spatial Statistics; VBA = Voxel-Based Analysis; ROI = Region of Interest; FA = Fractional Anisotropy; MD = Mean Diffusivity; RD = Radial Diffusivity; LD = Longitudinal Diffusivity; NDI = Neurite Dispersion Index; FISO = Free Isotropic Water Fraction; ROC = Receiver Operating Characteristic; AUC = Area Under Curve.