Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul;12(7):3836–3843. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.01.19

Table 3. Correlation among patients’ age, sex and KRAS mutational status.

Samples Age Sex KRAS mutation (AF)
1 36 F p.G12D (1.5%)
2 64 M p.G12C (1.3%)
3 48 M p.G12C (0.6%)
4 59 F p.G12D (1.3%)
5 89 M p.G12D (7.2%)
6 62 M p.G12C (5.6%)
7 64 M p.G13S (0.2%)
8 76 F p.G13D (0.3%)
9 69 M p.G12S (6.4%)
10 65 M p.G12C (3.3%)
11 84 M p.G13S (0.2%)
12 74 F p.G12C (24.0%)
13 73 F p.G12C (0.9%)
14 49 M p.G12S (1.4%)
15 61 F p.G12C (4.6%)
16 69 M p.G12C (46.8%)
17 70 M p.G12S (7.1%)
18 65 F p.G12V (24.0%)
19 68 M p.G12D (0.9%)
20 58 M p.G12C (3.9%)
21 65 F p.G12C (2.5%)
22 69 M p.G13D (0.4%)
23 73 M p.G12C (2.9%)
24 84 M p.G13S (0.6%)
25 70 M p.G13S (0.7%)
26 65 M p.G13D (4.2%)
27 63 M p.G12C (4.7%)
28 78 M p.G12D (2.0%)
29 77 M p.G12A (0.7%)
30 81 F p.G12V (1.0%)
31 51 F p.G12C (3.1%)
32 68 M p.G13D (0.7%)
33 52 F p.G12V (4.6%)
34 70 M p.Q61H (0.2%)
35 77 M p.Q61H (4.7%)
36 64 F p.A59V (0.2%)

KRAS, Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog; AF, allelic frequency; F, female; M, male.