Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;20(3):2499–2505. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11768

Table III.

Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for DFS and OS.

DFS OS


Parameters P-value Relative risk 95% CI P-value Relative risk 95% CI
Age, years (<55 vs. ≥55) 0.066 1.644 0.240–3.217 0.075 1.234 0.256–2.768
ER (negative vs. positive) 0.110 0.440 0.161–1.205 0.210 0.330 0.330–1.789
PR (negative vs. positive) 0.059 0.324 0.101–1.042 0.078 0.225 0.134–1.567
HER2 (0 and 1+ vs. 2+ and 3+) 0.943 1.014 0.733–1.403 0.956 1.002 0.567–1.876
ANGPTL4 (negative vs. positive) 0.011 2.353 0.733–3.403 0.034 2.034 0.534–3.567
pTNM stage (I+II vs. III+IV) 0.004 2.450 1.338–4.488 0.002 2.678 1.448–4.213
Grade (I+II vs. III) 0.524 0.764 0.378–2.468 0.645 0.534 1.456–2.145
Tumor size, cm (≤5 vs. >5) 0.876 1.075 0.435–2.656 0.896 0.989 0.546–2.132
Lymph node metastasis (no vs. yes) 0.021 1.844 1.098–3.099 0.043 1.234 0.987–3.007

DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ANGPTL4, angiopoietin-like 4.