Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 27;12(7):1907. doi: 10.3390/nu12071907

Table 3.

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between dietary pattern scores and prostate cancer risk, overall and by tumor grade, PROtEuS, Montreal, Canada, 2005–2012 1.

Quartiles of Dietary Pattern Score 1991 Controls All Prostate Cancers 1917 Cases Low-Grade Prostate Cancers 2 1385 Cases High-Grade Prostate Cancers 3 529 Cases
n n Cases/OR (95% CI) n Cases/OR (95% CI) n Cases/OR (95% CI)
Healthy Eating
1 497 499/1.00 (reference) 335/1.00 (reference) 163/1.00 (reference)
2 499 505/0.95 (0.78–1.15) 378/1.07 (0.86–1.32) 126/0.75 (0.57–0.99)
3 497 477/0.84 (0.68–1.02) 343/0.91 (0.73–1.14) 133/0.77 (0.58–1.02)
4 498 436/0.76 (0.61–0.93) 329/0.90 (0.71–1.13) 107/0.66 (0.48–0.89)
ptrend = 0.004 ptrend = 0.16 ptrend = 0.008
Western Salty and Alcohol
1 498 457/1.00 (reference) 325/1.00 (reference) 132/1.00 (reference)
2 498 482/0.92 (0.76–1.13) 331/0.88 (0.70–1.10) 149/0.99 (0.75–1.32)
3 497 482/0.87 (0.71–1.06) 355/0.88 (0.71–1.10) 126/0.82 (0.61–1.10)
4 498 496/0.89 (0.72–1.09) 374/0.91 (0.73–1.14) 122/0.78 (0.58–1.06)
ptrend = 0.21 ptrend = 0.59 ptrend = 0.05
Western Sweet and Beverages
1 498 388/1.00 (reference) 285/1.00 (reference) 103/1.00 (reference)
2 498 442/1.01 (0.82–1.24) 325/0.96 (0.76–1.20) 117/0.96 (0.70–1.30)
3 498 494/1.12 (0.91–1.38) 360/1.01 (0.80–1.27) 134/1.06 (0.78–1.45)
4 497 593/1.35 (1.10–1.66) 415/1.14 (0.91–1.44) 175/1.32 (0.98–1.80)
ptrend = 0.002 ptrend = 0.23 ptrend = 0.02

1 Adjusted for age, ancestry, education, first-degree family history of prostate cancer, and timing of last prostate cancer screening. 2 Prostate cancer cases with a Gleason score ≤ 6, or of 7 with a primary score of 3. 3 Prostate cancer cases with a Gleason score of 7 with a primary score of 4, or ≥ 8. Information on the primary or secondary score was missing for 3 cases.