Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;17(14):4962. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17144962

Table 2.

Results of the quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale criteria.

Studies Selection Comparability Outcome Quality Score †
Representativeness of the exposed cohort Selection of the non-exposed cohort Ascertainment of exposure Outcome of Interest Was Not Present at
Start of Study
Comparability of cohorts based on the design or analysis Assessment of outcome Follow-Up Long Enough for Outcome to Occur (Median Duration of Follow-Up ≥ 6 Months) Adequacy of follow up of cohorts
Langhorne et al. (2000) [14] Three major hospitals in the West of Scotland were participated. Two hospitals provided acute stroke patient care and one hospital provide acute stroke rehabilitation care after one-week discharge. ★ No non-exposed cohort Weekly assessments in hospitals by 3 research nurses ★ Yes ★ Complication subdivided by their baseline level of dependency and compared using Chi-square test. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ Yes ★ 100% participated at the 6-month follow-up, 99% at the 18-month follow-up, and 93% at the 30-month. ★ Good
Gamble et al. (2000) [29] Consecutive cohort of stroke patients admitted to a single hospital. Yes ★ Patients underwent interview about shoulder pain ★ Yes ★ Age, sex, level of anxiety, disability score, or moderate to severe motor weakness were adjusted in chi-square test. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ No Not reported Poor
Gamble et al. (2002) [16] Consecutive cohort of stroke patients admitted to a single hospital. Yes ★ Patients underwent interview about shoulder pain ★ Yes ★ Age, sex, depression and anxiety scores, and functional scores were adjusted in chi-square test. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ Yes ★ 97% participated at the 6-month follow-up. ★ Good
Aras et al. (2004) [9] Consecutive cohort of stroke
patients admitted to a single hospital.
Yes ★ Patients underwent interview about
shoulder pain ★
No The presence of spasticity, thalamic pain, neglect, and comorbidities were compared between groups with and without shoulder pain. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ No No statement Poor
Lindgren et al. (2007) [6] Participants were representative of the Lund Stroke Register which covers the population of Lund-Orup, including 8 municipalities representing the local geographical area of Lund University Hospital. ★ Yes ★ Patients underwent interview about shoulder pain ★ Yes ★ Univariate analyses were used to compare arm motor function, disability, self-perceived health, subluxation, and sensory disturbance, between patients with and without shoulder pain. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ Yes ★ 79% participated at the 4-month follow-up, and 73% at the 12-month follow-up. ★ Good
Sackley et al. (2008) [30] Potential participants were representative of the Nottingham Stroke Register, which includes all stroke admissions to Nottingham City Hospital and Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. ★ No non-exposed cohort Patients underwent interview about shoulder pain ★ Yes ★ confounders were not reported. Questionnaire based structured interview ★ Yes ★ 84% participated at the 3-month follow-up, 61% at the 6-month follow-up, and 50% at the 12-month follow-up. ★ Poor
Kuptniratsaikul et al. (2009) [31] Participants were representative of Thai Stroke Rehabilitation Registry, which maintain the record of patients with stroke who underwent rehabilitation
in Thailand. ★
Yes ★ Patients underwent interview about shoulder pain ★ No Confounders were compared using the multivariate analysis. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ No No statement Poor
Blennerhassett et al. (2010) [11] The 94 retrospective histories of patients admitted for inpatient rehabilitation were audited which represented 63% of stroke patients in a 3-year period. Yes ★ Medical report No Confounders were compared using the logistic regression analysis. ★ Retrospective data No No statement Poor
Klit et al. (2011) [32] Participants were representative of National Indicator Project database which records all hospitalized acute stroke patients in Denmark. ★ Yes ★ Patients reported shoulder pain Yes ★ Confounders were compared using the multiple logistic regression analysis. ★ Questionnaire-based survey No No statement Poor
Hansen et al. (2012) [33] Consecutive cohort of stroke patients admitted to a single hospital. No Patients underwent a structured interview. ★ No Age and gender were adjusted in chi-square test. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ Yes ★ 97% participated at the 3-month follow-up, and 92% at the 6-month follow-up. ★ Poor
Lindgren et al. (2012) [34] Participants were representative of the Lund Stroke Register which covers the population of Lund-Orup, including 8 municipalities representing the local geographical area of Lund University Hospital. ★ Yes ★ Patients underwent interview about shoulder pain ★ Yes ★ Univariate analyses were used to compare age, pain frequency, affected side, motor function, and passive range of abduction between patients with and without shoulder pain. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ Yes ★ 79% participated at the 4-month follow-up, and 73% at the 12-month follow-up. ★ Good
Kuptniratsaikul et al. (2013) [35] Participants were representative of Thai Stroke Rehabilitation Registry, which maintain the record of patients with stroke who underwent rehabilitation in Thailand. ★ Yes ★ Patients underwent interview about shoulder pain ★ No Confounders were compared using the multivariate analysis. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ Yes ★ 65% participated at the 12-month follow-up. ★ Good
Chen et al. (2014) [36] The medical records of patients consecutively admitted to a single hospital. No Retrospective data No Confounders were compared using the Chi-square test. ★ Retrospective medical record data No No statement Poor
Kim et al. (2014) [37] Consecutive cohort of stroke patients admitted to a single hospital. Yes ★ Patients underwent interview about
shoulder pain ★
Yes ★ Age, gender and significant variables from the univariate analysis were included in the final multivariate logistic regression model. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ Yes ★ 78% participated at the 3-month follow-up, and 62% at the 6-month follow-up. ★ Good
Kwon et al. (2014) [38] Participants were representative of eight rehabilitation units situated in three different large local catchment area in the Republic of Korea. ★ Yes ★ Patients underwent interview about shoulder pain ★ No Age, sex, the Motricity Index of the upper and lower limbs, and ambulatory types were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ No No statement Poor
Karaahmet et al. (2014) [39] Consecutive cohort of stroke patients admitted to a single physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic. Yes ★ Patients underwent interview about shoulder pain ★ No Disease duration, neglect, sensory disturbance, spasticity, immobilization, late rehabilitation, and motor function were included in backward stepwise multinomial
logistic regression analysis. ★
Questionnaire based structured interview ★ Yes ★ No statement Fair
Adey-Wakeling et al. (2015) [3] A population-based stroke incidence study conducted in a specific region of the western suburbs of Adelaide, South Australia. ★ Yes ★ Patients underwent interview about shoulder pain ★ No logistic regression models were used to analyses different confounders. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ Yes ★ 78% participated at the 4-month follow-up, and 75% at the 12-month follow-up. ★ Good
Paolucci et al. (2016) [40] Consecutive cohort of stroke
patients admitted to at eight Italian hospitals. ★
No Patients underwent interview about
shoulder pain ★
No Age, gender, type of stroke, and severity of stroke were included in regression analysis. ★ Questionnaire based structured interview ★ No No statement Poor

Good quality: 3 or 4 stars (★) in selection domain AND 1 or 2 stars in comparability domain AND 2 or 3 stars in outcome domain; Fair quality: 2 stars in selection domain AND 1 or 2 stars in comparability domain AND 2 or 3 stars in outcome/exposure domain; Poor quality: 0 or 1 star in selection domain OR 0 stars in comparability domain OR 0 or 1 stars in outcome/exposure domain.