Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 15;17(14):5118. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145118

Table 2.

Feasibility definitions, operationalization and analyses for Connecting Conversations.

Feasibility Concept Definition Operationalization for Connecting Conversations
  • Element Analyzed

Analysis
Completeness Extent to which Connecting Conversations was completed as planned All planned triads were randomly selected and completed in the learning network as planned
Interviewers completed the training and all planned conversations
  • Conversations

  • Learning network

  • Description of successes and challenges of random selection of triads on a ward and the learning network

  • Completed conversations rate 1, including documentation of incomplete and missing triads, and the duration of the conversations

  • Description of recruited interviewers and attendance rate 1 training

Protocol adherence Extent to which the conversations were performed as planned All interviewers followed the Connecting Conversations’ protocol as taught during the training.
  • Conversations

  • Training

  • All six questions were asked as formulated in the protocol 1

  • Per conversation at least one probing question and one time paraphrasing was used 1

  • The respondent talked more than the interviewer 1

Interviewer experiences Interviewers’ satisfaction with Connecting Conversations and experienced facilitators and barriers All interviewers evaluated all components of Connecting Conversations: training, scheduling conversations, performing conversations and registering conversations.
  • Conversations

  • Registration

  • Training

  • Learning network

Deductive coding of interviewer experiences, categorized into elements that were appreciated and that were considered challenging

1 Interpret as total percentage of participants: <60% not acceptable, 60%–80% acceptable, >80% good.