Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;9(7):532. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9070532

Table 1.

Comparison of MLST and cgMLST Typing Methods.

Typing Scheme Schema Diversity Number of Groups Generated
Number of Groups Identified * Simpson’s D.I. Beef Chicken Dairy Human Swine
MLST 174 0.963 33 54 34 64 16
cgMLST200 197 0.964 38 102 40 87 18
cgMLST100 298 0.983 73 131 68 103 22
cgMLST50 422 0.991 115 150 107 122 22
cgMLST25 543 0.997 149 168 141 145 23
cgMLST10 652 0.999 175 187 162 156 23
cgMLST5 734 0.999 196 196 173 175 23
cgMLST0 828 1 211 205 180 216 23

* Typing groups may be found in multiple hosts.