Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):500. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10070500

Table 1.

Studies with a control group.

First author (No. of Perform. MDs) No. of Patients Procedure Time (min) Fluoroscopy Time (min) Contrast Volume (mL) No. of Angiograms Other End Points Kirkpatrick’s Level
CAS
Wooster (2018) [17] (3 MDs) 6 PsR 31.9 (14.2–54) + 11.4 (5.4–19.8) 59.2 (29–108) + N/A 3
9 controls 42.5 (30.9–69) + 19.4 (9.8–38) + 76.9 (38–120) +
EVAR
Desender (2016) [16] (99 MDs) a and Desender (2017) [13] b 50 PsR 52.1 (46.2–58.8) + 15.3 (12.7–18.3) + 81 (73–91) + 6.5 (5.9–7.2) + Proximal landing zone:
−23% *,+
Distal landing zone:
−21% *,+
Reduction in minor errors: −26% *
Reduction in major errors: −76% *
Reduction in errors causing delay: −27% *
4
50 controls 54.6 (48.4–61.6) + 14.4 (12–17.3) + 93 (84–104) + 7.5 (6.7–8.2) + Technical success rates:
Primary: PsR 82% vs. control 78%
Ass. Primary PsR 94% vs. control 86%
Våpenstad (2020) [18] (16 MDs) c 30 PsR 44 (23–129) * 24 (14–53) 90 (60–260) 7 (4–18) Technical success rates:
Primary: PsR 93% vs. control 77%
Ass. Primary: PsR 3,3% vs. control 13%
3
30 controls 55 (27–132) 27 (14–55) 107 (24–240) 7 (4–20)

CAS = carotid artery stenting; EVAR = endovascular aortic aneurism repair; N/A = not available; PsR = patient-specific rehearsal; MD = Medical Doctor. All values are medians (range) unless otherwise stated. Metrics compare PsR vs. no PsR (control). * Statistically significant P-value (p < 0.05). + Mean values (range). a Sixty-eight percent of the procedures were performed by an experienced team, defined as a team in which at least 2 out of 3 members had performed at least 50 EVAR cases. b Desender et al. (2016) and Desender et al. (2017) are based on the same patient group, each article presenting different data. Green text represents Desender et al. (2017). c Five had less than 2 years’ experience, and the others had more than 2 years. There was at least one experienced operator present at each procedure.