Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 3;14(8):1616–1639. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12744

Table 1.

DNMT, TET, and IDH observed mutations in hematological malignancies and their prognostic value.

Gene Mutation Condition Frequency Prognostic value References
DNMT1 Missense and nonsense mutations AML Small subset of cases (rare mutations) Not studied [149, 150, 151]
DNMT3A Missense mutation (amino acid R882H) AML 20–60% (hot spot) Adverse prognostic impact [9, 150, 152, 153, 154]
MDS 10% Adverse prognostic impact [155, 156]
Frameshift and truncating mutations AML 15–20% Not studied [9]
DNMT3B Truncating mutations AML Small subset of cases (rare mutations) Not studied [157]
Missense mutation (amino acid N442K) ATL Small subset of cases (rare mutations) Not studied [158]
TET1 Missense mutations AML ~ 1% Not studied [40, 150]
Missense and frameshift mutations T‐ALL 14% Not studied [40, 159]
TET2 Several missense, nonsense, and frameshift mutations AML ~ 10% Shorter overall survival (mutated vs no mutated) [41]
Truncating mutations MDS 10–30% Not studied [42, 43]
Several missense, nonsense, and frameshift mutations MPN 10–20% Not studied [41, 42, 43]
Several missense, nonsense, and frameshift mutations CMML 40–50% Not studied [41]
Several missense, nonsense, and frameshift mutations DLBCL 5–10% Not observed [117]
IDH1 Missense mutation (amino acid R132H) AML ~ 10% Controversial [48, 58]
MDS 2–10% Controversial [58, 160]
IDH2 Missense mutation (amino acid R172K) AML ~ 10% Controversial [48, 58]
MDS 2–5% Controversial [58, 160]
Missense mutation (amino acid R140Q) AML ~ 10% Controversial [48, 58]
MDS 2–10% Controversial [58, 160]