Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 6;12(7):2003. doi: 10.3390/nu12072003

Table 1.

Retention time (Rt), wavelengths of maximum absorption (λmax), mass spectral data, and the identification and quantification of phenolic compounds in fresh juice and purified juice of Viburnum opulus fruit.

Peak No. Phenolic Compound Rt (min) λmax (nm) [M − H]/
[M + H]+
(m/z)
Fragment(s) Ions (m/z) Content (mg/g)
Fresh Juice (FJ) Purified Juice (PJ)
1 Neochlorogenic acid 1 4,50 318 353 191, 179 0.007 ± 0.001 0,215 ± 0.019
2 Procyanidin dimer B1 1 5.12 276 577 407, 289 0.759 ± 0.003 47.596 ± 0.148
3 Caffeoylquinic acid derivative I 2 5.17 323 707 191 0.015 ± 0.000 1.289 ± 0.058
4 Caffeoylquinic acid derivative II 2 5.35 323 707 191 0.024 ± 0.002 1.051 ± 0.008
5 Procyanidin trimer I 3 5.60 278 865 577, 289, 243 0.112 ± 0.001 6.866 ± 0.342
6 (+)-Catechin 1 5.70 278 289 245, 202 0.657 ± 0.006 40.729 ± 0.596
7 Caffeoylquinic acid derivative III 2 5.74 323 707 191 0.017 ± 0.001 1.220 ± 0.020
8 Procyanidin trimer II 3 5.87 275 865 577, 289, 243 0.030 ± 0.006 2.634 ± 0.270
9 Chlorogenic acid 1 6.20 318 353 191, 707 a 8.039 ± 0.145 645.492 ± 1.984
10 Cryptochlorogenic acid 1 6.50 323 353 191, 173 0.004 ± 0.000 0.484 ± 0.023
11 Procyanidin dimer B2 1 6.61 278 577 407, 289 0.199 ± 0.002 11.540 ± 0.148
12 Gallocatechin gallate 4 6.84 280 457 169 0.031 ± 0.000 1.876 ± 0.085
13 Caffeoylquinic acid 4 7.31 313 353 191, 133, 707 a 0.745 ± 0.001 44.344 ± 0.176
14 (−)-Epicatechin 1 7.40 278 289 245, 202 0.135 ± 0.002 8.002 ± 0.116
15 Cyanidin-3-sambubioside 1 7.53 515 581+ 287 0.093 ± 0.000 7.010 ± 0.003
16 Cyanidin-3-glucoside 1 7.74 515 449+ 287 0.139 ± 0.000 13.583 ± 0.799
17 Procyanidin dimer C1 1 7.86 278 865 407, 289 0.033 ± 0.001 3.212 ± 0.351
18 B-typeprocyanidin dimer derivative I 5 7.96 276 739 577, 289 0.016 ± 0.000 2.071 ± 0.097
19 Cyanidin-3-rutinoside 1 8.10 516 595+ 287 0.068 ± 0.001 5.072 ± 0.016
20 Procyanidin trimer III 3 8.32 278 865 577, 289, 243 0.032 ± 0.000 1.796 ± 0.053
21 Caffeoylquinic acid derivative IV 2 8.40 325 705 513 0.034 ± 0.000 3.306 ± 0.014
22 Caffeoylquinic acid derivative V 2 8.56 325 705 513 0.034 ± 0.000 3.268 ± 0.010
23 B-type procyanidin dimer derivative II 5 8.92 278 739 577, 289 0.035 ± 0.000 2.293 ± 0.094
24 Feruloylquinic acid I 3 9.43 325 367 193, 134 n.d. 5.722 ± 0.021
25 Quercetin-3-vicianoside 6 9.70 351 595 301, 300, 271 0.020 ± 0.000 1.266 ± 0.007
26 Procyanidin dimer 3 10.03 278 577 407, 289 0.024 ± 0.001 1.602 ± 0.258
27 Feruloylquinic acid II 3 10.13 304 367 193, 134 n.d. 0.528 ± 0.005
28 Quercetin-3-galactoside 4 10.18 365 463 300, 271 n.d. 0.149 ± 0.011
29 Quercetin-3-rutinoside 1 10.29 344 609 301, 270, 151 0.016 ± 0.000 0.921 ± 0.007
30 (Epi)catechin derivative I 2 11.13 280 451 289, 161 0.103 ± 0.001 6.998 ± 0.221
31 (Epi)catechin derivative II 2 11.27 280 451 289, 161 0.080 ± 0.001 6.006 ± 0.165
32 Quercetin-3-rhamnoside 4 11.78 344 447 301, 270, 255, 227 0.007 ± 0.000 0.491 ± 0.002

n.d.—not detected; a dimeric adduct. Results are expressed as a mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). The values expressed differ significantly (one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test, p ≤ 0.05). 1—identification based on a comparison of retention time, UV-vis spectra (200–600 nm) and MS data for standards; 2,3,4,5—identification based on a comparison of molecular ions and typical ion fragments with published data; 2—[6], 3—[7], 4—[8], 5—[9], 6—[10].