Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 18;12(7):2136. doi: 10.3390/nu12072136

Table 6.

Logistic binary PN vs. AGIR and PN vs. STEP.

PN vs. AGIR PN vs. STEP
Odds Ratio (95% CIs) p Odds Ratio (95% CIs) p
Weaning off PN 1.1 (1.00–1.17) 0.03 1.13 (1.01, 1.31) 0.045
Survival 1.05 (1.01–1.09) 0.01 1.06 (0.99, 1.15) 0.051
Tx 1.14 (0.91, 1.44) 0.27 1.17 (0.86, 1.59) 0.31
LD 0.40 (0.11, 1.46) 0.21 1.19 (0.90, 1.58) 0.20
Model 1 *
Weaning off PN 1.08 (1.01, 1.16) 0.03 1.12 (1.01,1.29) 0.048
Survival 1.15(0.9, 1.45) 0.11 1.64 (0.64, 2.39) 0.26
Tx 1.07 (0.80, 1.44) 0.51 1.01 (0.57, 1.9) 0.71
LD 1.24 (0.93, 1,63) 0.13 1.68 (0.61, 3.1) 0.28
Model 2 **
Weaning off PN 1.18 (0.82, 1.13) 0.052 1.26 (0.97, 1.64) 0.07
Survival 1.04 (0.99, 1.11) 0.06 1.10 (0.98, 1.28) 0.09
Tx 0.78 (0.49, 1.21) 0.26 1.21 (0.41, 3.1) 0.78
LD 1.31 (0.95, 1.83) 0.10 1.23 (0.89,1.71) 0.39

PN: Parenteral nutrition; AGIR: autologous reconstructive gastro-intestinal surgery; STEP: serial transverse enteroplasty; CI: confidence interval; Tx: Transplantation; LD: liver disease; * Adjusted for age; ** Adjusted for age and primary diagnosis (gastroschisis).