Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 16;12(7):2109. doi: 10.3390/nu12072109

Table 3.

Model 1: Regression model comparing energy intake (kcal) among advanced stage PD patients vs. healthy controls as well as early stage PD patients vs. healthy controls when controlling for sex. Model 2: Regression model comparing energy intake (kcal) among advanced stage PD patients vs. early stage PD patients when controlling for sex. Two outliers were excluded (Cook’s distance greater than (4/n)).

Primary Outcome Models B t p Lower Bound 95% Confidence Interval for B Upper Bound 95% Confidence Interval for B
1 *
Sex 297.729 5.738 0.000 193.862 401.596
Early PD 40.651 0.651 0.517 −84.269 165.571
Advanced PD −162.063 −2.623 0.011 −285.731 −38.394
2 *
Sex 297.729 5.738 0.000 193.862 401.596
Healthy control −40.651 −0.651 0.517 −165.571 84.269
Advanced PD −202.713 −3.208 0.002 −329.214 −76.213

* = model is significant, p < 0.05. Sex: 1 = male, 0 = female. Parkinson’s disease (PD). Unstandardized b coefficients showing the change in kcal (B), the t test statistic (t), p-value (p).