Table 3.
The relative abundance of different bacteria on taxonomic genus level.
| Low-Dairy Diet | High-Dairy Diet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (%) | IQR (%) | Median (%) | IQR (%) | PD (%) 1 | p-Value 2 | p FDR | |
| Streptococcus | 0.15 | (0.05–0.43) | 1.81 | (0.21–5.17) | 1077 | 1.25 × 10−7 | 4.13 × 10−5 |
| Leuconostoc | 0.00 | (0.00–0.00) | 0.01 | (0.00–0.02) | 8.87 × 10−6 | 9.68 × 10−4 | |
| Lactococcus | 0.00 | (0.00–0.00) | 0.004 | (0.00–0.02) | 4.84 × 10−4 | 0.03 | |
| Faecalibacterium | 8.34 | (2.80–13.14) | 5.30 | (1.41–8.60) | −36 | 4.96 × 10−4 | 0.03 |
| Bilophila | 0.02 | (0.00–0.04) | 0.01 | (0.00–0.02) | −60 | 9.88 × 10−4 | 0.05 |
| Dorea | 1.48 | (1.03–2.11) | 1.88 | (1.21–2.89) | 27 | 0.01 | 0.21 |
| Lachnobacterium | 0.07 | (0.01–0.14) | 0.01 | (0.00–0.06) | −91 | 0.01 | 0.23 |
| Parvimonas | 0.00 | (0.00–0.00) | 0.00 | (0.00–0.004) | 0.04 | 0.61 | |
| Slackia | 0.04 | (0.00–0.15) | 0.07 | (0.00–0.25) | 79 | 0.06 | 0.61 |
| Ruminococcus | 5.02 | (3.31–7.45) | 4.75 | (2.76–7.38) | −5 | 0.12 | 0.61 |
| Coprococcus | 6.29 | (4.40–8.04) | 5.38 | (4.08–6.95) | −14 | 0.12 | 0.61 |
| Blautia | 9.27 | (6.16–13.56) | 9.79 | (7.77–14.64) | 6 | 0.17 | 0.61 |
| Dialister | 0.04 | (0.00–0.88) | 0.03 | (0.00–0.70) | −30 | 0.2 | 0.61 |
| Collinsella | 1.78 | (1.20–2.32) | 1.86 | (0.95–3.90) | 5 | 0.23 | 0.61 |
| Eubacterium | 0.12 | (0.01–1.62) | 0.15 | (0.01–2.02) | 25 | 0.51 | 0.78 |
| Roseburia | 4.82 | (2.60–10.13) | 5.89 | (1.83–10.66) | 22 | 0.66 | 0.87 |
| Paraprevotella | 0.01 | (0.00–0.07) | 0.00 | (0.00–0.02) | −100 | 0.69 | 0.89 |
| Bifidobacterium | 2.27 | (0.80–5.60) | 1.86 | (0.54–5.17) | −18 | 0.69 | 0.89 |
| Bacteroides | 1.47 | (0.77–3.09) | 1.48 | (0.61–3.13) | 1 | 0.73 | 0.91 |
| Oscillospira | 2.04 | (0.98–2.62) | 1.87 | (0.64–3.42) | −9 | 0.9 | 0.99 |
1 Percentage difference of the HDD compared to the LDD. 2 p-values were obtained from the Linear Mixed-Effects model.