Skip to main content
. 2020 May 18;66(2):140–146. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169

Table 2. Effectiveness of PEMF therapy: intra- and inter-group comparisons.

Groups Parameter PEMF group (n=33) Sham group (n=30) p**
  Before After Change p* Before After Change p*  
  treatment treatment D   treatment treatment D    
Neck pain (VAS) § 8 (4-10) 3 (1-10) 4 (0-8) 0,000 8 (4-10) 4 (0-10) 3.5 (-6-10 ) 0,000 0,256
Neck Pain Disability Scale 57.5±22.1 33.7±22.9   0,001 54.6±21.1 41.4±25.7   0,010 0.063†
Physical functioning§ 70 (0-100) 75 (15-100) 0 (-25-35) 0,145 65 (0-100) 65 (0-100) 0 (-30-55) 0,553 0,713
Role limitations due to physical health§ 12.5 (0-50) 37.5 (0-50) 0 (-50-50) 0,051 6.3 (0-50) 25 (0-50) 0 (-25-50) 0,020 0,847
Role limitations due to emotional problems§ 16.6 (0-50) 33.3 (0-50) 0 (-17-50) 0,109 16.6 (0-50) 33.3 (0-50) 0 (-33.4-50) 0,051 0,629
Energy/fatigue§ 10 (10-75) 50 (5-85) 10 (-35-60) 0,034 10 (5-100) 45 (0-100) 0 (-60-35) 0,301 0,704
Mental Health§ 58 (24-88) 64 (22-84) 4 (-54-48) 0,296 60 (8-95) 70 (20-95) 3 (-20-60) 0,010 0,599
Social functioning§ 62.5 (0-100) 56.3 (12-100) 0 (-37.5-50) 0,063 56.3 (10-100) 62.5 (12.5-100) 12.5 (-25-40) 0,006 0,621
Bodily pain§ 32.5 (0-100) 62.5 (22.5-90) 22.5 (-20-67.5) <0.001 32.3 (0-100) 57.5 (10-100) 13.8 (-22.5-67.50) 0,000 0,377
General Health§ 50 (0-95) 55 (0-95) 10 (-25-60) 0,007 50 (5-95) 45 (10-95) 5 (-50-45) 0,437 0,361
PEMF: Pulsed electromagnetic field; VAS: Visual analog scale; § Median (min-max); * Within-group comparison; ** Between-group comparison; † Two-way ANOVA.