Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 10;9(7):602. doi: 10.3390/antiox9070602

Table 1.

Analysis of phenolic compounds (mg/L) in MF, NF and RO samples by UHPLC.

Phenolic Compounds Feed MF-P NF-R NF-P RO-R RO-P
Caffeic acid 8.1 ± 0.5 c 7.6 ± 0.5 d 27.7 ± 1.4 b 1.8 ± 0.2 e 45.7 ± 1.2 a 0.5 ± 0.03 f
p-Coumaric acid 6.4 ± 0.4 c 4.3 ± 0.2 d 12.2 ± 0.8 b 2.6 ± 0.2 e 35.9 ± 1.6 a nd
Ferulic acid 6.9 ± 0.6 c 6.3 ± 0.3 d 20.1 ± 1.1 b nd 51.3 ± 1.4 a nd
Luteolin 15.2 ± 0.6 c 13.7 ± 1.1 d 71.5 ± 2.7 b nd 82.8 ± 3.1 a nd
4-Hydroxyphenyl acetate 72.6 ± 1.8 a 67.0 ± 2.6 b 29.6 ± 1.2 e 64.0 ± 3.2 c 57.1 ± 1.2 d nd
Hydroxytyrosol 373.3 ± 4.8 c 320.1 ± 5.8 d 1017.5 ± 8.8 b 268.3 ± 1.2 e 1522.2 ± 7.3 a 18.8 ± 1.2 f
Oleuropein 106.8 ± 4.0 c 85.2 ± 2.7 d 263.2 ± 4.2 b nd 510.0 ± 5.5 a nd
Tyrosol 89.7 ± 2.1 c 68.1 ± 5.1 d 157.3 ± 4.3 b 64.8 ± 1.2 e 519.0 ± 6.2 a 5.0 ± 0.6 f
Vanillic acid 29.4 ± 0.3 c 27.8 ± 1.7 d 97.0 ± 2.5 b 6.5 ± 0.9 e 116.2 ± 3.1 a 1.4 ± 0.1 f
Verbascoside 26.7 ± 1.1 c 18.0 ± 1.3 d 82.8 ± 3.4 b nd 130.9 ± 1.2 a nd

MF, microfiltration; NF, nanofiltration; RO, reverse osmosis; P, permeate; R, retentate. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D.; Differences were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) completed with a multicomparison Tukey’s test. Means in the same row with different small letters differ significantly (p < 0.05). nd: not detected.