Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;5(8):1271–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.06.002

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of enrolled participants

Baseline characteristic Study 1
Study 2a
Niacinamide (N = 10)b Niacinamide (N = 18) Placebo (N = 18)
Age, mean (SD), yr 34.4 (11.3) 40.1 (10.9) 44.7 (9.1)
Male sex, n (%) 8 (80) 10 (56) 6 (33)
Race, n (%)
 Caucasian, non-Hispanic 9 (90) 18 (100) 18 (100)
 Hispanic 1 (10) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Hypertension, n (%) 9 (90) 18 (100) 14 (78)
ACEI/ARB, n (%) 6 (60) 16 (89) 13 (72)
htTKV, mean (SD), ml/m 729 (319) 1210 (772) 1021 (434)
Irazabal class, n (%)
 1A 0 (0.0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 1B 1 (11) 3 (17) 1 (6)
 1C 3 (33) 5 (28) 10 (56)
 1D 4 (44) 5 (28) 6 (33)
 1E 1 (11) 5 (28) 1 (6)
 2 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
eGFR, mean (SD), ml/min per 1.73 m2 102.1 (16.7) 78.1 (18.6) 68.1 (12.0)

ACEI/ARB, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; htTKV, height-adjusted total kidney volume.

a

In study 2, continuous measures were compared between treatment groups using the 2-sample t test. htTKV violated the assumption of normality, so this measure was log-transformed for inferential comparison. For categorical measures, Pearson’s χ2 test was used when expected cell counts were at least 5 in at least 80% of the cells; otherwise, Fisher’s exact test was used. No significant difference between treatment groups was detected.

b

N = 9 for htTKV and Mayo class.