Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 7;43(8):863–871. doi: 10.1002/clc.23340

Table 1.

Coronary atherosclerosis characteristics across studies comparing athletes and controls

Möhlenkamp (2008) 10 Merghani (2017) 9 Aengevaeren (2017) 8 DeFina (2019) 24
Exercise volume group Marathon runners (n = 108) Age‐matched controls (n = 864) Age and RF‐matched controls (n = 216) Athletes (n = 106) Controls (n = 54) Most active (>2000 MET‐min/wk) (n = 75) Least active (<1000 MET‐min/wk) (n = 88) Most active (>3000 MET‐min/wk) (n = 1561) Less active (<3000 MET‐min/wk) (n = 20 197)
CAC prevalence (%) 71 82 a 69 48 41 68 43 a NA NA
CAC prevalence (OR) NA NA NA NA NA 3.2 (1.6–6.6) 1.00 (reference) a 1.11 (1.03‐2.20) 1.00 (reference) a
CACS in all individuals (AU) 36 (0‐217) 38 (3‐187) 12 (0–78) a 0 0 9.4 (0‐60.9) 0 (0‐43.5) a NA NA
CACS in CAC >0 b (AU) NA NA NA 86 3 a 39 (8‐159) 69.6 (14‐332) NA NA
Plaque prevalence (%) NA NA NA 44 22 a 77% 56 a NA NA

Note: Data shown as percentage or with 95% confidence interval or median (interquartile range).

Abbreviations: AU, Agatston units; CAC, coronary artery calcification; CACS, CAC score; MET, metabolic equivalent of task; NA, not available; OR, odds ratio; RF, risk factor.

a

Significantly (P < .05) different from athletes/most active cohort.

b

CACS only in CAC > 0 thus lower number of participants.