Skip to main content
letter
. 2020 Jun 9;4(4):317–332. doi: 10.1002/evl3.184

Table 2.

Results from redundancy analyses (RDAs) assessing how natural enemies, population structure, and environmental conditions each contribute to variation in coevolutionary traits. Conditional RDAs show the proportion of variance explained (prop. var.) by a given explanatory variable after removing the effects of the conditioned variables listed within the parentheses of Condition(). Marginal models only include significant variables after forward model selection. Significant p‐values are highlighted in bold

Response Variable Explanatory Variable(s) F p‐Value Prop. var.
Snake TTX Resistance Newt TTX 8.866 0.023 0.496
Snake Genomic PCos 4.244 0.064 0.448
Environmental PCs 0.751 0.51 −0.067
Newt TTX + Condition(Snake Genomic PCos) 1.891 0.242 0.071
Snake Genomic PCos + Condition(Newt TTX) 1.171 0.389 0.023
Newt TTX + Condition(Environmental PCs) 14.137 0.005 0.732
Environmental PCs + Condition(Newt TTX) 2.778 0.145 0.170
Snake Genomic PCos + Condition(Environmental PCs) 3.195 0.136 0.451
Environmental PCs + Condition(Snake Genomic PCos) 0.690 0.558 −0.064
Marginal Model: Newt TTX 8.866 0.023 0.496
Newt TTX Snake TTX Resistance 8.866 0.025 0.496
Newt Genomic PCos 24.975 0.003 0.857
Environmental PCs 9.859 0.008 0.689
Snake TTX Resistance + Condition(Newt Genomic PCos) 0.052 0.818 −0.027
Newt Genomic PCos + Condition(Snake TTX Resistance) 7.892 0.021 0.334
Snake TTX Resistance + Condition(Environmental PCs) 14.137 0.01 0.214
Environmental PCs + Condition(Snake TTX Resistance) 15.596 0.007 0.407
Newt Genomic PCos + Condition(Environmental PCs) 4.831 0.076 0.174
Environmental PCs + Condition(Newt Genomic PCos) 1.140 0.426 0.006
Marginal Model: Newt Genomic PCo1 36.278 0.001 0.815