Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 3;24(2):79–86. doi: 10.5114/wo.2020.97475

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression

Characteristics Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Age ≥ 50 years vs. < 50 years 0.72 (0.49–1.06) 0.098 0.61 (0.40–0.93) 0.020
Status: post- vs. premenopausal 0.76 (0.52–1.11) 0.158
T3–T4 vs. T1–T2 0.55 (0.31–0.99) 0.044
N+ vs. N0 0.62 (0.42–0.91) 0.016
G3 vs. G1–G2 0.80 (0.53–1.22) 0.304
ER+ vs. ER0 2.20 (1.40–3.48) 0.001 2.10 (1.30–3.41) 0.003
PR+ vs. PR0 1.95 (1.29–2.96) 0.002
HER2 positive vs. HER2 negative 0.17 (0.11–0.28) 0.0001 0.17 (0.11–0.28) 0.0001
Breast cancer patients age < 50 years
T3–T4 vs. T1–T2 0.90 (0.41–1.95) 0.934
N+ vs. N0 0.51 (0.28–0.93) 0.038
G3 vs. G1–G2 1.20 (0.66–2.17) 0.658
ER+ vs. ER0 2.02 (1.05–3.88) 0.049 1.94 (0.98–3.83) 0.058
PR+ vs. PR0 1.47 (0.80–2.73) 0.277
HER2 positive vs. HER2 negative 0.24 (0.12–0.47) 0.0001 0.25 (0.13–0.48) 0.0001
Breast cancer patients: age ≥ 50 years
T3–T4 vs. T1–T2 0.30 (0.11–0.78) 0.011 0.35 (0.13–0.96) 0.041
N+ vs. N0 0.67 (0.40–1.14) 0.182
G3 vs. G1–G2 0.49 (0.26–0.92) 0.036
ER+ vs. ER0 2.54 (1.32–4.87) 0.007 2.03 (1.01–4.08) 0.046
PR+ vs. PR0 2.46 (1.38–4.36) 0.003
HER2 positive vs. HER2 negative 0.11 (0.05–0.24) 0.0001 0.12 (0.05–0.26) 0.0001