Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 3;40(8):BSR20193141. doi: 10.1042/BSR20193141

Table 5. Haplotype analyses in the two populations.

Han population Tibetan population
Gene/haplotype Case (%), n=1264 Control (%), n=1210 P OR (95% CI) Case (%), n=1226 Control (%), n=1210 P OR (95% CI)
TLR2
ACCG 342.1 (27.1) 302.4 (25.0) 0.235 1.12 (0.93–1.34) 249.0 (20.3) 238.1 (19.8) 0.817 1.02 (0.84–1.25)
ACTG 27.4 (2.2) 44.7 (3.7) 0.025 0.58 (0.36–0.94)
ATTG 380.3 (30.1) 321.0 (26.5) 0.048 1.19 (1.00–1.42) 393.0 (32.1) 351.9 (29.2) 0.165 1.13 (0.95–1.35)
GTTG 497.7 (39.4) 527.0 (43.6) 0.035 0.84 (0.72–0.99) 558.0 (45.5) 579.1 (48.1) 0.140 0.89 (0.75–1.04)
Other* 14.4 (0.01) 15.0 (1.2) 26.0 (2.1) 34.9 (2.9)
TLR4
CTGG 318.4 (25.2) 320.9 (26.5) 0.429 0.93 (0.78–1.11) 417.6 (34.1) 377.9 (31.4) 0.149 1.13 (0.96–1.34)
TCCG 297.9 (23.6) 304.6 (25.2) 0.335 0.91 (0.76–1.10) 188.4 (15.4) 222.9 (18.5) 0.040 0.80 (0.65–0.99)
TCGG 464.5 (36.8) 424.6 (35.1) 0.410 1.07 (0.91–1.26) 464.3 (37.9) 446.8 (37.1) 0.670 1.04 (0.88–1.22)
TTGC 108.3 (8.6) 93.0 (7.7) 0.433 1.12 (0.84–1.50) 70.2(5.7) 85.3 (7.1) 0.175 0.80 (0.58–1.11)
TTGG 54.4 (4.3) 44.6 (3.7) 0.441 1.17 (0.78–1.76) 59.6 (4.9) 47.9 (4.0) 0.286 1.24 (0.84–1.82)
Other* 20.5 (1.6) 22.3 (1.8) 25.9 (2.1) 23.2 (2.0)
TOLLIP
CCG 463.9 (36.7) 400.0 (36.4) 0.879 1.01 (0.86–1.19) 433.5 (35.4) 4345.0 (36.1) 0.705 0.97 (0.82–1.14)
CTA 402.9 (31.9) 379.6 (31.4) 0.803 1.02 (0.86–1.21) 433.8 (35.4) 392.1 (32.6) 0.137 1.14 (0.96–1.35)
TTA 384.1 (30.4) 376.4 (31.1) 0.682 0.97 (0.81–1.15) 343.2 (28.0) 362.9 (30.1) 0.250 0.90 (0.76–1.08)
Other* 13.1 (1.0) 14.1 (1.2) 15.6 (1.2) 14.1 (1.2)
*

Those with lowest frequency threshold (LFT) < 0.03 were pooled in this part.