Checkpoint Inhibitors |
Checkpoint Inhibitors |
|
High cost of treatment
Dose limitation and increased grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)
Development of resistance
Tumors lacking immune infiltrates may not respond
Incomplete understanding of the determinants of hyperprogression
|
[11,29,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,65,66,67,68,69,70] |
Chemotherapy |
Significantly improved response rates
Increase in release of tumor-associated antigens and effector cells’ activation
Some chemotherapies increase expression of checkpoint molecules, which can be overcome by combination with checkpoint inhibitors
|
|
[30,31,32,33,35,36,50,64] |
Radiotherapy |
Significantly improved response rates
May help overcome resistance to checkpoint inhibition as monotherapy
Radiotherapy leads to increased tumor antigen release, T cell activation/infiltration, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I expression
Increased abscopal effects
|
Dose-limiting toxicities prevalent
Type of radiation, fractionation, and sequence of combination is not universal
Variable results with combination in neoadjuvant, concurrent, and adjuvant settings
Radiation may have direct negative effects on immune effectors and may increase frequency of Tregs
|
[71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79] |
Cancer Vaccines |
Checkpoint Inhibitors |
|
Most antigens that are the target of cancer vaccines are not tumor-restricted antigens; hence there is a risk of off-target effects
Resistance through antigen escape and upregulation of additional checkpoint molecules is possible
Not all studies have found added benefit of the combination, which highlights the need to design potent cancer vaccines
No optimal dosing and sequence of treatments have been identified
Unclear if the combination is efficacious in adjuvant or neo-adjuvant setting
|
[48,80,81,82,83] |
Co-stimulatory Molecule Agonists |
Checkpoint Inhibitors |
Promote activation, and development and maintenance of T cell memory
Multiple preclinical studies show improved activation of immune responses and anti-tumor effects of the combination
|
Existing trials of monotherapies show high toxicity or low efficacy
Lack of available clinical trials results of combinations
Unclear mechanisms for monotherapy or combinations
Timing of treatment for optimal efficacy is unclear
|
[84,85,86,87,88,89,90] |
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) and Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Therapy |
Checkpoint Inhibitors, Chemotherapy |
Unprecedented response rates, including high frequency of complete responses
High response rates even in patients who have failed multiple prior therapies
Two CD19 CAR T cells are already U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved
Amenable to modulation of T cell function to improve efficacy, decrease off-target effects, and decrease toxicity
CAR T cell therapy is not MHC-restricted
Combination helps overcome exhaustion
|
Significant risk of off target effects and toxicities
Neurotoxicity and cytokine release syndromes are challenges that still needs to be overcome
Lengthy and stringent manufacturing process
Lack of sufficient trials evaluating the feasibility, dosing sequence, and toxicities associated with the combinations
Treatment is expensive
In vivo persistence of infused cells are not optimal
|
[91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117] |