Table 1. Wolbachia infection frequencies in D. yakuba and D. santomea on São Tomé.
Species | Year | N | Infected | p (confidence interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|
D. yakuba | 2001 | 35 | 14 | 0.40 (0.24, 0.58) |
2009 | 155 | 118 | 0.76 (0.69, 0.83) | |
2015 | 41 | 31 | 0.76 (0.60, 0.88) | |
2018 | 81 | 71 | 0.88 (0.79, 0.93) | |
Low altitude | 40 | 32 | 0.80 (0.65, 0.90) | |
High altitude | 41 | 39 | 0.95 (0.84, 0.99) | |
D. santomea | 2005 | 39 | 25 | 0.64 (0.47, 0.79) |
2009 | 57 | 44 | 0.77 (0.64, 0.87) | |
2015 | 38 | 14 | 0.37 (0.22, 0.54) | |
2018 | 78 | 62 | 0.80 (0.69, 0.87) | |
Site 1 | 24 | 19 | 0.79 (0.60, 0.91) | |
Site 2 | 54 | 43 | 0.80 (0.67, 0.88) |
Sample sizes (N), infection frequencies (p), and exact 95% binomial confidence intervals are shown for each year. Data from 2001 to 2015 are from Cooper et al. (2017). For each species, infection frequencies are calculated for the pooled 2018 dataset and for each region.