Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 16;9(7):939. doi: 10.3390/foods9070939

Table 3.

Yeast and mold loads of fruit samples.

Treatments Yeast Molds
0 d 2 d 4 d 7 d 10 d 0 d 2 d 4 d 7 d 10 d
CTR <2a <2a 3.21 ± 0.17a 3.64 ± 0.23a 3.97 ± 0.15a <2a <2a <2a 3.88 ± 0.17a 4.46 ± 0.17a
AVG <2a <2a 2.55 ± 0.14b 2.87 ± 0.19b 3.37 ± 0.20b <2a <2a <2a 3.13 ± 0.10b 3.71 ± 0.09b
HPMC <2a <2a 2.21 ± 0.25b 2.44 ± 0.27b 3.05 ± 0.25b <2a <2a <2a 2.84 ± 0.25b 3.65 ± 0.21b
LEO <2a <2a 2.29 ± 0.29b 2.50 ± 0.23b 3.07 ± 0.10b <2a <2a <2a 2.90 ± 0.21b 3.67 ± 0.20b
p-value NS NS 0.002 0.001 0.001 NS NS NS 0.001 0.001

Units are log CFU/g. Results indicate mean values ± S.D. of four plate counts (carried out in triplicate for two independent productions). Data within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Tukey’s test. Abbreviations: CTR, uncoated fruit slices, AVG, fruit slices coated with 40% v/w of Aloe vera gel only, HPMC, fruit slices coated with 40% v/w of Aloe vera gel + 0.1% v/w of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, LEO, fruit slices coated with 40% v/w of Aloe vera gel + 0.1% v/w of lemon essential oil, TMM, total mesophilic microorganisms, TPM, total psychrotrophic microorganisms and NS, not significant (p-value ≥ 0.05).