Abstract
SARS2‐CoV‐2 breakout in Italy caused a huge number of severely ill patients with a serious increase in mortality. Although lungs seem to be the main target of the infection, very few information are available about liver involvement, possibly evocating a systemic disease. Post‐mortem wedge liver biopsies from 48 patients died from severe pulmonary COVID‐19 disease with respiratory failure were collected from two main hospitals in northern Italy. No patient had clinical symptoms of liver disease or signs of liver failure before and during hospitalization; for each of them liver function tests were available. All liver samples showed minimal inflammation features. Histological pictures compatible with vascular alterations were observed, characterized by increase in number of portal vein branches associated with lumen massive dilatation, partial or complete luminal thrombosis of portal and sinusoidal vessels, fibrosis of portal tract, focally markedly enlarged and fibrotic. SARS‐CoV‐2 was found in 15 of 22 samples tested by in situ hybridization method. Our preliminary results confirm the clinical impression that liver failure is not a main concern and this organ is not the target of significant inflammatory damage. Histopathological findings are highly suggestive for marked derangement of intrahepatic blood vessel network secondary to systemic changes induced by virus that could target not only lung parenchyma but also cardiovascular system, coagulation cascade and endothelial layer of blood vessels. It still remains unclear if the mentioned changes are directly related to virus infection or if SARS‐CoV‐2 triggers a series of reactions leading to striking vascular alterations.
Keywords: liver histopathology, liver morphology in COVID 19 disease, SARS‐Cov‐2 infection and liver biopsy
1. INTRODUCTION
SARS‐Cov‐2 infection was first diagnosed in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, and then it spread all around the world. On 11th March 2020 the World Health Organization declares a worldwide pandemic status. The large majority of patients develop a mild self‐resolving infection, but in some cases patients present pneumonia and the most severe of them progress to a systemic disease with multiple organ dysfunction.
Bergamo, a city located in north of Italy not far from Milan, became quickly the epicenter of the Italian COVID‐19 outbreak. Up to the end of March 2020 more than 9000 people were infected and at least 2500 persons died. Even the area of Milan registered a high number of infected people.
To our knowledge, this is the first report of a large series of liver histopathology findings from COVID‐19 patients died for respiratory failure. Significant liver clinical involvement has never been observed, neither liver pathology in COVID‐19 disease nor clinical‐pathological correlations have been reported.
2. METHODS
Wedge liver sample was obtained post‐mortem in 48 SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive patients. Testing for HCV antibodies were negative in all patients; one patient was HBsAg positive/ HBV DNA negative.
Main demographical and comorbidity data are summarize in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Male/Female (ratio) | 22/8 (2.75:1) |
Age (y) mean (range) | 71 (32‐86) |
No comorbidity | 6/45 (13.3%) |
Hypertension | 24/45 (53.3%) |
Cardiovascular Disease (different than hypertension) | 17/45 (37.8%) |
Diabetes | 13/45 (28.9%) |
Obesity | 7/45 (15.6%) |
Kidney disease | 10/45 (22.2%) |
Pulmonary disease | 5/45 (11.1%) |
Information not available | 10/45 (22.2%) |
The autopsies were performed after a median time of 6 hours from death in Airborne‐Infection‐Isolation autopsy rooms and the medical staff used the correct Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), according to “Engineering control and PPE recommendations for autopsies”. Only skilled pathologists (AS, AG, PZ, LC, AP and MN) were enrolled to perform post‐mortem procedures.
Sampling procedure was partial autopsy limited to lungs, heart and liver in 30 patients ( Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital Bergamo) and a complete autopsy in 18 cases excluding brain (Luigi Sacco Hospital Milan). No patient had previous history of liver disease or portal hypertension nor developed clinical signs or symptoms of liver failure during hospital stay.
A median of two tissue blocks were taken random from each liver as macroscopic aspect was normal; the size of all the blocks obtained was comparable. Tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for >48 hours and embedded in paraffin. Three‐µm paraffin sections were stained with by Haematoxylin and Eosin.
Each wedge liver sample contained at least 20 portal fields; histological examination was performed blindly by experienced pathologists confident with liver histopathology (AS, LL, RR, AP and MN) and questionable reports were reviewed jointly. Supplementary immunohistochemical searches for immunophenotyping of inflammatory cells (CD3, CD20) or for easier detection of endothelial layer and vessel conformation (CD34, factor VIII, D2‐40) were obtained in 20 cases. Actin smooth muscle antibody (SMA) was applied to all samples to study framework of muscular layer of portal veins and pericytes activation. Details of antibodies used are reported in Table S1.
SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA was searched in 22 samples by RNAscope® 2.5 LSx Assays Leica Biosystems’ BOND RX System, using a method of in situ hybridization (ISH) to visualize single RNA molecules per cell in formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissue mounted on slides.
Laboratory findings were obtained from clinical charts: we considered the highest value of P p‐thrombin time (PT, expressed as international normalized ratio ‐INR‐), D‐dimer, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and gamma‐glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and bilirubin reached during the hospital stay.
Results are expressed as ratio with the upper reference levels (fold‐x‐ULR); for platelet count and for Albumin the lowest value was selected. As a result of very short hospital stay, few data are lacking for some patients.
3. RESULTS
Main histological findings obtained from liver biopsies are summarized in Table 2.
TABLE 2.
All patients n = 48 (100%) |
|
---|---|
Portal vein parietal fibrosis (phlebosclerosis) | |
Absent | 19(39%) |
Focal (up to 25% of the portal tracts) | 14 (29%) |
Multifocal (25%‐75% of the portal tracts) | 11 (22%) |
Diffuse (>75% of the portal tracts) | 4 (8%) |
Herniated portal vein in periportal parenchyma | |
Absent | 12 (25%) |
Focal (up to 25% of the portal tracts) | 18 (37%) |
Multifocal (25%‐75% of the portal tracts) | 13 (27%) |
Diffuse (>75% of the portal tracts) | 5 (10%) |
Periportal abnormal vessels | |
Focal (up to 25% of the portal tracts/parenchyma) | 27 (56%) |
Multifocal (25%‐75% of the portal tracts/parenchyma) | 18 (37%) |
Diffuse (>75% of the portal tracts/parenchyma) | 3 (6%) |
Fibrosis | |
Absent | 11( 24%) |
Portal fibrosis | 29 (60%) |
Incomplete fibrous septa | 8 (16%) |
Lobular inflammation | |
Absent | 24 (50%) |
Mild | 23 (48%) |
Moderate | 1 (2%) |
Severe | 0 (0%) |
Portal inflammation | |
Absent | 16 (33%) |
Mild | 32 (66%) |
Moderate | 0 (0%) |
Severe | 0 (0%) |
Vascular thrombosis | |
Partial portal | 24 (50%) |
Complete portal | 11 (23%) |
Incomplete sinusoidal | 7 (14%) |
Complete sinusoidal | 6 (12%) |
Parenchymal confluent necrosis | |
Absent | 30 (65%) |
Mild (<25% of the lobule) | 5 (11%) |
Moderate (25%‐50% of the lobular) | 7 (15%) |
Severe (>50% of the lobule) | 6 (12%) |
Steatosis | |
Absent | 22 (46%) |
Small droplets (% of affected hepatocytes) | 3 (5,5,20% of liver cells) (6%) |
Large droplets (%) | 1 (20% of liver cells) (2%) |
Mixed small and large droplets (%) |
22 (46%) (50,50,50,40,20,10,30,10,10,10,20,50,10,20,30 25, 30, 10, 20, 60, 20, 15% of liver cells) |
Lobular architecture was well preserved in all the samples; inflammatory infiltrate, when present, was mainly represented by scattered portal and lobular lymphocytes (predominantly CD4 T lymphocytes) with variable degree of portal vein endotheliitis and only mild/moderate portal fibrosis was detected; biliary intrahepatic tree did not show any significant histological alteration (Figure 1A).
The definitely emerging morphological features were characterized by diffuse alterations of intrahepatic vascular structures (portal branches and sinusoids) and variable degree of partial/complete luminal thrombosis (Figure 1B,C); CD 34 decorated abnormally sinusoids in all lobular zones (Figure 1D). Central veins did not show significant alteration of lumen calibre and of wall configuration.
Majority of portal fields showed an increased number of portal veins associated with luminal severe dilatation (Figure 2A) and wall fibrosis (Figure 2B); in a large number of portal veins the lumen focally herniated in periportal liver parenchyma and completely circumscribed by liver cells plates (Figure 2C). Kupffer cells were found extremely activated with large cytoplasm containing necrotic debris (Figure 2D).
In order to exclude post‐mortem cloths, only vessels with clearly enlarged lumen occupied by red cells mixed with lymphocytes and granulocytes were considered affected by thrombotic process. Questionable cases were reviewed jointly by two pathologists and diagnosis of thrombosis reported only if complete agreement was met (Figure 3A). Steatosis (large droplets, small droplets, mixed large and small droplets) was observed in more than 50% of samples; all 18 obese patients showed liver steatosis, which was also found in 14 overweight subjects (BMI >25, <30).
Smooth muscle layer of portal vein lamina media was fragmented (Figure 3B), partially lost and occasionally infiltrated by inflammatory cells lymphocytes, likewise overlying endothelium (Figure 3C). SMA antibody also decorated a large number of perivascular‐activated pericytes within portal vein walls and in adventitial areas; this peculiar cells are not usually detected in routine setting.
Immunohistochemical search for C4d, performed in all samples, was completely negative.
SARS‐CoV‐2 was detected in 15/22 tested samples inside blood cloths or within endothelial cells cytoplasm.
All the patients but one showed some abnormality of liver function tests as summarized in Figure 4. The abnormality rate was as follows: AST 40/41 (97.6%), ALT 25/41 (61.0%), GGT 20/26 (76.9%) and albumin 18/22 (81.8%). Three patients experienced ALT level > 10xN and their liver morphology was characterized by confluent hemorrhagic necrosis (Figure 3D).
A total of 25/26 (96%) patients had a very high value of D‐dimer values ≥500 ng/dL; the distribution of PT‐INR values and platelet count are summarized in Figure 4 (bottom).
4. DISCUSSION
Morphological studies concerning description and interpretation of liver parenchymal changes induced or related to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection are completely lacking. By now only one post‐mortem report is available in Chinese language and focused mainly on lung destructing lesions 1 ; a review paper quoted a single case of liver post‐mortem biopsy, pointing out bile duct damage as main histological feature. 2 Some authors stressed peculiar severe alterations of clotting parameters induced by viral infection. 3 Lung histopathological injury induced by COVID‐19 infection has been extensively investigate in the largest group of subjects till now described, confirming severe thrombotic disturbances. 4
Knowledge of liver pathology is totally blank and there are no comparisons available at present time among laboratory findings and liver histology.
Since outbreak of this pandemic in Lombardy (Italy), we had the unique option to collect a large series of liver samples of patients dead with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: furthermore laboratory tests were available allowing a comparison between morphology and biochemical findings. Liver histology examination demonstrated that this organ is not involved in any significant inflammatory response to SARS‐Cov‐2 virus detected by ISH in tissue and does not develop any significant clinical and histological bile duct damage, in disagreement with a previous single report 2 ; our data strongly support the clinical impression that liver failure is not a main issue in management of COVID‐19‐affected patients, as previously pointed out. 5
All our morphological findings are consistent with a vascular‐related damage caused by impaired blood flow, generating lesions similar to histological picture observed in hepatopulmonary syndrome and in obliterative portal venopathy. 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 Moreover diffuse network of sinusoids decorated by CD34 additionally suggests a disturbed circulation of blood within the liver. 10
A presumable physiopathological explanation could be an increased blood flow within the liver, sometimes related to heart distress, and/or thrombotic phenomena in portal and sinusoidal vessels which modify intrahepatic blood circulation. High D‐dimer levels in blood, previously described a risk factor in COVID 19 disease, 11 were evident in most patients and support this hypothesis along with histological changes in lungs of patients dead from COVID‐19 infection which display huge number of thrombotic medium and small calibre branches of pulmonary arteries infection. 4
The abnormal high levels of transaminases observed in three patients could be explained by extensive vascular portal and sinusoidal thrombosis, leading to confluent parenchymal necrosis and liver cells accelerated apoptosis. To support this hypothesis, we underline that cases of obliterative portal venopathy 6 , 9 were associated with congenital or acquired anomalies of some factors activated during clotting cascade. Another putative mechanism could be an immunological attack to endothelial layer, recently reported about lungs. 12
The histological findings strengthen the hypothesis that the derangement of coagulation process or impairment of blood circulation or endothelial damage could be main triggers mechanism in pathogenesis of COVID‐19 damage, not only within the liver but probably also in other solid organs. This theory fits really well with some recently published observations by a British group focusing the main rule of clotting system in COVID‐19 liver damage. 5
It is questionable if the injury needs strictly the ongoing presence of the SARS‐Cov‐2 virus in tissues or if the reaction targeting endothelium and vessels walls is induced by virus but it is afterwards self‐maintaining; further investigations are in progress about this item.
Our findings concerning detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 virus in the liver by ISH method are really intriguing but at present insufficient to support any definite conclusion; we anyway support the hypothesis that viral infection wages a series of pathological processes that proceed disconnect from virus presence.
Another main point of interest concerns the evidence in all samples of massive pericytes activation. Active involvement in the recruitment of inflammatory cells in liver injury by pericytes is a well‐known mechanism; inflammatory process may induce myofibroblast‐like cells transformation of pericytes generating quick and abundant amounts of extracellular matrix proteins and finally leading to vessel wall fibrosis. 13
A crucial question is if any previous chronic asymptomatic condition such as phlebosclerosis noted in variable degree of severity in all biopsies could be a hidden predisposing factor to liver damage partially related to the advanced age of the patients. This precondition may be exacerbated by a further inflammatory injury and pericytes activation induced by viral infection and clearly evident in our material.
A promising field of great interest will involve the study of endothelial cell alterations induced by virus infection and its interactions with clotting process. Further studies are required to reach more detailed information on this item.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Autoptic exams and histopathological examination: AS, AG, LL, DM, PZ, LC, RR, EL and AP. Paper writing: AS, MN, MGA, GP and MS. Laboratory testing and critical results evaluation: GP, MS and MG.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
This work is based exclusively on routine file autoptic material and is ethical approval exempt to use anonymous data. The study followed the Italian general rules used for research related to scientific purposes (official regulations n.72‐26 /03/2012).
Supporting information
Sonzogni A, Previtali G, Seghezzi M, et al. Liver histopathology in severe COVID 19 respiratory failure is suggestive of vascular alterations. Liver Int. 2020;40:2110–2116. 10.1111/liv.14601
Handling Editor: Luca Valenti
REFERENCES
- 1. Yao XH, Li TY, He ZC, Ping YF, Liu HW, Yu SC, Mou HM, Wang LH, Zhang HR, Fu WJ, Luo T. A pathological report of three COVID‐19 cases by minimally invasive autopsies. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2020;49:E009. 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20200312-00193. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sun J, Aghemo A, Forner A, Valenti L. COVID‐19 and liver disease. Liver Int. 2020;40(6):1278‐1281. 10.1111/liv.14470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Tang N, Li D, Wang X, et al. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:844‐847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Carsana L, Sonzogni A, Nasr A, et al. Pulmonary post‐mortem findings in a large series of COVID‐19 cases from Northern Italy. Lancet Infect Dis, accepted for publication. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bangash MN, Patel J, Parekh D. COVID‐19 and the liver: little cause for concern. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(6):529‐530. 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30084-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cazals‐Hatem D, Hillaire S, Rudler M, et al. Obliterative portal venopathy: portal hypertension is not always present at diagnosis. J Hepatol. 2011;54(3):455‐461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Sempoux C, Bioulac‐Sage P. Vascular liver lesions: contemporary views on long‐recognized entities. Virchows Arch. 2018;473(1):1‐2. 10.1007/s00428-018-2328-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. DeLeve LD, Valla DC, Garcia‐Tsao G. Vascular disorders of the liver. Hepatology. 2009;49(5):1729‐1764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Guido M, Sarcognato S, Sonzogni A, et al. Obliterative portal venopathy without portal hypertension: an underestimated condition. Liver Int. 2016;36(3):454‐460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Guido M, Pizzi M, Sacerdoti D, Giacomelli L, Rugge M, Bolognesi M. Beyond scoring: a modern histological assessment of chronic hepatitis should include tissue angiogenesis. Gut. 2014;63:1366‐1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID‐19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054‐1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ackermann M, Verleden SE, Kuehnel M, et al. Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in Covid‐19 [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 21]. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(2):120‐128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. da Silva ML, Marson RF, Solari MIG, Nardi NB. Are liver pericytes just precursors of myofibroblasts in hepatic diseases? Insights from the crosstalk between perivascular and inflammatory cells in liver injury and repair. Cells. 2020;9(1):188. 10.3390/cells9010188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.