Table 2.

Facility-level correlates of integration of family planning services into HIV care in Kenya in 2016.

	Integration of FP services		Poisson Generalized Linear Model
	N [%]		Crude PR [95% CI]	p
	Yes	No
HIV burden
Low	20 [83]	4 [17]	1.19 [0.71–1.97]	0.51
Medium or high	59 [70]	25 [30]	ref	ref
Region
Nyanza	27 [77]	8 [23]	ref	ref
Nairobi	7 [35]	13 [65]	0.45 [0.20–1.04]	0.06
Othera	45 [85]	8 [15]	1.10 [0.68–1.77]	0.69
Hospital vs. clinic
Hospital	63 [74]	22 [26]	1.21 [0.60–2.44]	0.59
Clinic	9 [90]	1 [10]	ref	ref
Facility type
Public	60 [88]	8 [12]	1.86 [1.11–3.11]	0.02*
Private	19 [48]	21 [52]	ref	ref
ART patient volume per month
>1500	40 [78]	11 [22]	1.10 [0.71–1.71]	0.67
≤1500	39 [68]	18 [32]	ref	ref
No. of ART patients treated per staff per month
>78	41 [73]	15 [27]	0.96 [0.62–1.50]	0.86
≤78	38 [73]	14 [27]	ref	ref
PMTCT services offered at the facility
Yes	76 [73]	28 [27]	0.97 [0.31–3.10]	0.99
No	3 [75]	1 [25]	ref	ref

PR = prevalence ratio, CI = confidence interval; ART = Antiretroviral therapy, PMTCT = Prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission.

^aOther regions include Central, Coast, Eastern, Rift Valley, and Western provinces.

^*p < 0.05.