Table 3.

Characteristics of facilities offering integrated family planning services in Kenya in 2016 (N = 79).^a

	N	n [%] or Median [IQR]
Provides FP follow-up b	79	65 [82]
Providers trained to deliver FP (%)	78	30 [14–50]
Waiting time for FP services (minute) c	77	20 [l0–30]
FP methods discussed d
IUD	79	74 [94]
Implants	79	76 [96]
Injectable	79	77 [97]
OC	79	73 [92]
Condoms	79	77 [97]
Other e	79	61 [77]
Most frequently provided FP method at clinic	79
IUD		1 [1]
Implant		9 [12]
Injectable		39 [50]
OC		1 [1]
Condoms		27 [35]
Natural methods		2 [1]
Facilities experiencing any FP stock-outs (past year)	79	25 [32]
Stock-outs by method f
IUD	25	5 [20]
Implant	25	6 [24]
Injectable	25	10 [40]
OC	25	5 [20]
Condoms	25	15 [60]
Duration of stock-outs by method f,g
IUD	3	90 [7–330]
Implant	4	75 [32–210]
Injectable	4	44 [18–195]
OC	4	75 [30–210]
Condoms	4	34 [5–150]

FP = Family planning, IQR = interquartile range, IUD = intrauterine device, OC = Oral contraception.

Characteristics in this table are based on key informant surveys.

^aAt 29 non-integrated facilities, 90% provided referral services to another facility.

^bAt integrated facilities offering FP referrals, clients are followed up to confirm FP has been received.

^cAverage number of minutes a patient waits to receive FP services at this facility.

^dMore than one method may be discussed at a clinic but not all clinics discussed all methods.

^eOther methods include abstinence, natural methods, and diaphragm.

^fA clinic may experience stock-outs of more than one method but not all clinics experienced stock-outs of all methods.

^gNumber of days experiencing stock-outs in the past year.