Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;20(4):19. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.4.19

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Results from MLDS, MLCM, and matching experiments for observers judging (A) variegated checkerboards and (B) center-surround stimuli. Observers were sorted according to the similarity between MLDS and MLCM scales for the variegated checkerboards. Errorbars are 95% CI for MLDS and MLCM scales, and ± 2 SD for matching. Color legend as in Figure 4. Scales’ maxima relate inversely to the noise in the judgments estimated by MLDS or MLCM (see Noise estimation section).